Background: The number of resected lymph-nodes (#RNs) has proven prognostic in breast and colorectal cancer. Here we evaluated its prognostic impact in a series of resected NSCLC patients. Methods: A panel of established prognostic factors plus (1) #RNs or (2) the ratio between the number of metastatic nodes and #RNs (NR) were correlated to overall- (OS), cancer-specific- (CSS), and disease-free-survival (DFS), using the Cox-model. Risk-classes according to hazard ratios (HR) were generated. Internal and external validation was accomplished. Results: A dataset of 415 resected NSCLC patients was retrieved. At multivariate analysis, #RNs and NR were independent factor for longer OS, CSS and DFS (p < 0.0001). Patients with a #RNs > 10 (identified optimal cut-off) had a statistically significant OS (p = 0.02) and DFS (p = 0.0005) benefit. In node-positive patients, a NR < 9% significantly correlated with better outcome. Stratification into High-, Medium-, and Low-Risk classes, based on High- (HRFs: stage, N-status, age, #RNs) and Intermediate-Risk Factors (IRFs: sex, grading, histology), efficiently predicted outcomes (p < 0.0001). The risk class model performance was externally validated in and independent dataset of 297 patients. Conclusions: These results contribute to complete the panel of prognostic factors for resected NSCLC. A prospective larger validation and comparison with molecular prognostic tools is warranted.
A novel clinical prognostic score incorporating the number of resected lymph-nodes to predict recurrence and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer / Bria, E.; Milella, M.; Sperduti, I.; Alessandrini, G.; Visca, P.; Corzani, F.; Giannarelli, D.; Cerasoli, Virna; Cuppone, F.; Cecere, F. L.; Marchetti, A.; Sacco, R.; Mucilli, F.; Malatesta, S.; Guetti, Leonardo; Vitale, L.; Ceribelli, A.; Rinaldi, M.; Terzoli, E.; Cognetti, F.; Facciolo, F.. - In: LUNG CANCER. - ISSN 0169-5002. - 66:3(2009), pp. 365-371. [10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.02.024]
A novel clinical prognostic score incorporating the number of resected lymph-nodes to predict recurrence and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer
Milella M.;Sperduti I.;Visca P.;CERASOLI, VIRNA;Cuppone F.;GUETTI, LEONARDO;Cognetti F.;Facciolo F.
2009
Abstract
Background: The number of resected lymph-nodes (#RNs) has proven prognostic in breast and colorectal cancer. Here we evaluated its prognostic impact in a series of resected NSCLC patients. Methods: A panel of established prognostic factors plus (1) #RNs or (2) the ratio between the number of metastatic nodes and #RNs (NR) were correlated to overall- (OS), cancer-specific- (CSS), and disease-free-survival (DFS), using the Cox-model. Risk-classes according to hazard ratios (HR) were generated. Internal and external validation was accomplished. Results: A dataset of 415 resected NSCLC patients was retrieved. At multivariate analysis, #RNs and NR were independent factor for longer OS, CSS and DFS (p < 0.0001). Patients with a #RNs > 10 (identified optimal cut-off) had a statistically significant OS (p = 0.02) and DFS (p = 0.0005) benefit. In node-positive patients, a NR < 9% significantly correlated with better outcome. Stratification into High-, Medium-, and Low-Risk classes, based on High- (HRFs: stage, N-status, age, #RNs) and Intermediate-Risk Factors (IRFs: sex, grading, histology), efficiently predicted outcomes (p < 0.0001). The risk class model performance was externally validated in and independent dataset of 297 patients. Conclusions: These results contribute to complete the panel of prognostic factors for resected NSCLC. A prospective larger validation and comparison with molecular prognostic tools is warranted.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Bria_novel-clinical_2009.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
517.67 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
517.67 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.