Background. Despite the fact that genetic counseling in oncology provides information regarding objective risks, it can be found a contrast between the subjective and objective risk. The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of the perceived risk compared to the objective risk estimated by the BRCApro computer model and to evaluate any associations between medical, demographic and psychological variables and the accuracy of risk perception. Methods. 130 subjects were given medical-demographic file, Cancer and Genetic Risk Perception, Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale. It was also computed an objective evaluation of the risk by the BRCApro model. Results. The subjective risk was significantly higher than objective risk. The risk of tumour was overestimated by 56%, and the genetic risk by 67%. The subjects with less cancer affected relatives significantly overestimated their risk of being mutation carriers and made a more innacurate estimation than high risk subjects. Conclusion. The description of this sample shows: general overestimation of the risk, inaccurate perception compared to BRCApro calculation and a more accurate estimation in those subjects with more cancer affected relatives (high risk subjects). No correlation was found between the levels of perception of risk and anxiety and depression. Based on our findings, it is worth pursuing improved communication strategies about the actual cancer and genetic risk, especially for subjects at "intermediate and slightly increased risk" of developing an hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer or of being mutation carrier.

Subjective versus objective risk in genetic counseling for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancers / Caruso, A.; Vigna, C.; Marozzo, B.; Sega, F. M.; Sperduti, I.; Cognetti, F.; Savarese, A.. - In: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 1756-9966. - 28:Dec 21(2009), pp. 1-11. [10.1186/1756-9966-28-157]

Subjective versus objective risk in genetic counseling for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancers

Sperduti I.;Cognetti F.;
2009

Abstract

Background. Despite the fact that genetic counseling in oncology provides information regarding objective risks, it can be found a contrast between the subjective and objective risk. The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of the perceived risk compared to the objective risk estimated by the BRCApro computer model and to evaluate any associations between medical, demographic and psychological variables and the accuracy of risk perception. Methods. 130 subjects were given medical-demographic file, Cancer and Genetic Risk Perception, Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale. It was also computed an objective evaluation of the risk by the BRCApro model. Results. The subjective risk was significantly higher than objective risk. The risk of tumour was overestimated by 56%, and the genetic risk by 67%. The subjects with less cancer affected relatives significantly overestimated their risk of being mutation carriers and made a more innacurate estimation than high risk subjects. Conclusion. The description of this sample shows: general overestimation of the risk, inaccurate perception compared to BRCApro calculation and a more accurate estimation in those subjects with more cancer affected relatives (high risk subjects). No correlation was found between the levels of perception of risk and anxiety and depression. Based on our findings, it is worth pursuing improved communication strategies about the actual cancer and genetic risk, especially for subjects at "intermediate and slightly increased risk" of developing an hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer or of being mutation carrier.
2009
adult; aged; breast neoplasms; breast neoplasms, male; female; humans; male; middle aged; ovarian neoplasms; risk; risk assessment; young adult; genetic counseling; genetic predisposition to disease; perception
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Subjective versus objective risk in genetic counseling for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancers / Caruso, A.; Vigna, C.; Marozzo, B.; Sega, F. M.; Sperduti, I.; Cognetti, F.; Savarese, A.. - In: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 1756-9966. - 28:Dec 21(2009), pp. 1-11. [10.1186/1756-9966-28-157]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Caruso_Subjective-versus-objective_2009.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 668.78 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
668.78 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1310616
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact