Background: Although the addition of bevacizumab significantly improves the efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer, regulatory concerns still exist with regard to the magnitude of the benefits and the overall safety profile. Methods: A literature-based meta-analysis to quantify the magnitude of benefit and safety of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients was conducted. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were also performed to identify additional predictors of outcome and to assess the influence of trial design. Results: Five trials (3,841 patients) were gathered. A significant interaction according to treatment line was found for progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.027); PFS was significantly improved for 1st line (Hazard Ratio, HR 0.68, p < 0.0001), with a 1-yr absolute difference (AD) of 8.4% (number needed to treat, NNT 12). A non-significant trend was found in overall survival (OS), and in PFS for 2nd line. Responses were improved with the addition of bevacizumab, without interaction between 1st line (Relative Risk, RR 1.46, p < 0.0001) and 2 nd line (RR 1.58, p = 0.05). The most important toxicity was hypertension, accounting for a significant AD of 4.5% against bevacizumab (number needed to harm, NNH 22). Other significant, although less clinically meaningful, adverse events were proteinuria, neurotoxicity, febrile neutropenia, and bleeding. At the meta-regression analysis for 1st-line, more than 3 metastatic sites (p = 0.032), no adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.00013), negative hormonal receptor status (p = 0.009), and prior anthracyclines-exposure (p = 0.019), did significantly affect PFS. Conclusions: Although with heterogeneity, the addition of bevacizumab to 1st-line chemotherapy significantly improves PFS, and overall activity. Hypertension should be weighted with the overall benefit on the individual basis.

Magnitude of risks and benefits of the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients. Meta-regression analysis of randomized trials / Cuppone, F.; Bria, E.; Vaccaro, V.; Puglisi, F.; Fabi, A.; Sperduti, I.; Carlini, P.; Milella, M.; Nistico, C.; Russillo, M.; Papaldo, P.; Ferretti, G.; Aapro, M.; Giannarelli, D.; Cognetti, F.. - In: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 1756-9966. - 30:May 12(2011), pp. 1-9. [10.1186/1756-9966-30-54]

Magnitude of risks and benefits of the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients. Meta-regression analysis of randomized trials

Cuppone F.;Puglisi F.;Sperduti I.;Milella M.;Russillo M.;Cognetti F.
2011

Abstract

Background: Although the addition of bevacizumab significantly improves the efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer, regulatory concerns still exist with regard to the magnitude of the benefits and the overall safety profile. Methods: A literature-based meta-analysis to quantify the magnitude of benefit and safety of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients was conducted. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were also performed to identify additional predictors of outcome and to assess the influence of trial design. Results: Five trials (3,841 patients) were gathered. A significant interaction according to treatment line was found for progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.027); PFS was significantly improved for 1st line (Hazard Ratio, HR 0.68, p < 0.0001), with a 1-yr absolute difference (AD) of 8.4% (number needed to treat, NNT 12). A non-significant trend was found in overall survival (OS), and in PFS for 2nd line. Responses were improved with the addition of bevacizumab, without interaction between 1st line (Relative Risk, RR 1.46, p < 0.0001) and 2 nd line (RR 1.58, p = 0.05). The most important toxicity was hypertension, accounting for a significant AD of 4.5% against bevacizumab (number needed to harm, NNH 22). Other significant, although less clinically meaningful, adverse events were proteinuria, neurotoxicity, febrile neutropenia, and bleeding. At the meta-regression analysis for 1st-line, more than 3 metastatic sites (p = 0.032), no adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.00013), negative hormonal receptor status (p = 0.009), and prior anthracyclines-exposure (p = 0.019), did significantly affect PFS. Conclusions: Although with heterogeneity, the addition of bevacizumab to 1st-line chemotherapy significantly improves PFS, and overall activity. Hypertension should be weighted with the overall benefit on the individual basis.
2011
angiogenesis inhibitors; antibodies, monoclonal; antibodies, monoclonal, humanized; antineoplastic agents; bevacizumab; breast neoplasms; female; humans; neoplasm staging; randomized controlled trials as topic; risk assessment; treatment outcome
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Magnitude of risks and benefits of the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients. Meta-regression analysis of randomized trials / Cuppone, F.; Bria, E.; Vaccaro, V.; Puglisi, F.; Fabi, A.; Sperduti, I.; Carlini, P.; Milella, M.; Nistico, C.; Russillo, M.; Papaldo, P.; Ferretti, G.; Aapro, M.; Giannarelli, D.; Cognetti, F.. - In: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 1756-9966. - 30:May 12(2011), pp. 1-9. [10.1186/1756-9966-30-54]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cuppone_Magnitude_2011.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 337.2 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
337.2 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1310488
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact