INTRODUCTION: The optimal use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related molecular markers to prospectively identify tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitive patients, particularly after a previous chemotherapy treatment, is currently under debate. METHODS:: We designed a prospective phase II study to evaluate the activity of EGFR-TKI in four different patient groups, according to the combination of molecular (EGFR gene mutations, EGFR gene copy number and protein expression, and phosphorylated AKT expression, pAKT) and clinicopathological (histology and smoking habits) factors. Correlations between molecular alterations and clinical outcome were also explored retrospectively for first-line chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI treatment. RESULTS:: Patients who had progressed during or after first-line chemotherapy were prospectively assigned to EGFR-TKI treatment as follows: (G1) EGFR mutation (n = 12); (G2) highly polysomic/amplified EGFR (n = 18); (G3) EGFR and/or pAKT positive (n = 41); (G4) adenocarcinoma/bronchoalveolar carcinoma and no smoking history (n = 15). G1 and G4 had the best and second-best overall response rate (25% and 20%, respectively), whereas the worst outcome was observed in G2 (ORR, 6%; p = 0.05). Disease control was highest in G1 and G4 (>50%) and lowest in G3 (<20%) (p = 0.02). Patients selected by EGFR mutation or clinical parameters (G1 and G4) also had significantly better progression-free survival and overall survival (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed the impact of sex, smoking history, EGFR/KRAS mutation, and pAKT on outcomes and allowed us to derive an efficient predictive model. Histology, EGFR mutations, and pAKT were independent predictors of response to first-line chemotherapy at retrospective analysis, whereas pAKT and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression were the only independent predictors of progression-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS:: Selection of patients based on either EGFR mutation or clinical characteristics seems an effective approach to optimize EGFR-TKI treatment in chemotherapy-pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer patients. © 2012 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

EGFR molecular profiling in advanced NSCLC: a prospective phase II study in molecularly/clinically selected patients pretreated with chemotherapy / Milella, M.; Nuzzo, C.; Bria, E.; Sperduti, I.; Visca, P.; Buttitta, F.; Antoniani, B.; Merola, R.; Gelibter, A.; Cuppone, F.; D'Alicandro, V.; Ceribelli, A.; Rinaldi, M.; Cianciulli, A.; Felicioni, L.; Malatesta, S.; Marchetti, A.; Mottolese, Marcella.; Cognetti, F.. - In: JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1556-0864. - 7:4(2012), pp. 672-680. [10.1097/JTO.0b013e31824a8bde]

EGFR molecular profiling in advanced NSCLC: a prospective phase II study in molecularly/clinically selected patients pretreated with chemotherapy

Milella M.;Sperduti I.;Visca P.;Gelibter A.;Cuppone F.;D'Alicandro V.;Felicioni L.;Cognetti F.
2012

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The optimal use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related molecular markers to prospectively identify tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitive patients, particularly after a previous chemotherapy treatment, is currently under debate. METHODS:: We designed a prospective phase II study to evaluate the activity of EGFR-TKI in four different patient groups, according to the combination of molecular (EGFR gene mutations, EGFR gene copy number and protein expression, and phosphorylated AKT expression, pAKT) and clinicopathological (histology and smoking habits) factors. Correlations between molecular alterations and clinical outcome were also explored retrospectively for first-line chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI treatment. RESULTS:: Patients who had progressed during or after first-line chemotherapy were prospectively assigned to EGFR-TKI treatment as follows: (G1) EGFR mutation (n = 12); (G2) highly polysomic/amplified EGFR (n = 18); (G3) EGFR and/or pAKT positive (n = 41); (G4) adenocarcinoma/bronchoalveolar carcinoma and no smoking history (n = 15). G1 and G4 had the best and second-best overall response rate (25% and 20%, respectively), whereas the worst outcome was observed in G2 (ORR, 6%; p = 0.05). Disease control was highest in G1 and G4 (>50%) and lowest in G3 (<20%) (p = 0.02). Patients selected by EGFR mutation or clinical parameters (G1 and G4) also had significantly better progression-free survival and overall survival (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed the impact of sex, smoking history, EGFR/KRAS mutation, and pAKT on outcomes and allowed us to derive an efficient predictive model. Histology, EGFR mutations, and pAKT were independent predictors of response to first-line chemotherapy at retrospective analysis, whereas pAKT and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression were the only independent predictors of progression-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS:: Selection of patients based on either EGFR mutation or clinical characteristics seems an effective approach to optimize EGFR-TKI treatment in chemotherapy-pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer patients. © 2012 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.
2012
EGFR; KRAS; non-small-cell lung cancer; tyrosine kinase inhibitors; carcinoma, non small-cell lung; disease-free survival; ErbB receptors; female; humans; lung neoplasms; male; multivariate analysis; prospective studies; protein kinase Inhibitors; proto-oncogene proteins; proto-oncogene proteins p21(ras); ras proteins; mutation
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
EGFR molecular profiling in advanced NSCLC: a prospective phase II study in molecularly/clinically selected patients pretreated with chemotherapy / Milella, M.; Nuzzo, C.; Bria, E.; Sperduti, I.; Visca, P.; Buttitta, F.; Antoniani, B.; Merola, R.; Gelibter, A.; Cuppone, F.; D'Alicandro, V.; Ceribelli, A.; Rinaldi, M.; Cianciulli, A.; Felicioni, L.; Malatesta, S.; Marchetti, A.; Mottolese, Marcella.; Cognetti, F.. - In: JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1556-0864. - 7:4(2012), pp. 672-680. [10.1097/JTO.0b013e31824a8bde]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Milella_EGFR_2012.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.05 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1310446
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact