Background. Pineoblastoma is a rare pineal region brain tumor. Treatment strategies have reflected those for other malignant embryonal brain tumors. Patients and Methods. Original prospective treatment and outcome data from international trial groups were pooled. Cox regression models were developed considering treatment elements as time-dependent covariates. Results. Data on 135 patients with pineoblastoma aged 0.01-20.7 (median 4.9) years were analyzed. Median observation time was 7.3 years. Favorable prognostic factors were age ≥4 years (hazard ratio [HR] for progression-free survival [PFS] 0.270, P < .001) and administration of radiotherapy (HR for PFS 0.282, P < .001). Metastatic disease (HR for PFS 2.015, P = .006), but not postoperative residual tumor, was associated with unfavorable prognosis. In 57 patients <4 years old, 5-year PFS/overall survival (OS) were 11 ± 4%/12 ± 4%. Two patients survived after chemotherapy only, while 3 of 16 treated with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with boost, and 3 of 5 treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and local radiotherapy survived. In 78 patients aged ≥4 years, PFS/OS were 72 ± 7%/73 ± 7% for patients without metastases, and 50 ± 10%/55 ± 10% with metastases. Seventy-three patients received radiotherapy (48 conventionally fractionated CSI, median dose 35.0 [18.0-45.0] Gy, 19 hyperfractionated CSI, 6 local radiotherapy), with (n = 68) or without (n = 6) chemotherapy. The treatment sequence had no impact; application of HDCT had weak impact on survival in older patients. Conclusion. Survival is poor in young children treated without radiotherapy. In these patients, combination of HDCT and local radiotherapy may warrant further evaluation in the absence of more specific or targeted treatments. CSI combined with chemotherapy is effective for older non-metastatic patients.

Evaluation of age-dependent treatment strategies for children and young adults with pineoblastoma: analysis of pooled European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOP-E) and US Head Start data / Mynarek, M.; Pizer, B.; Dufour, C.; Van Vuurden, D.; Garami, M.; Massimino, M.; Fangusaro, J.; Davidson, T.; Gil-Da-Costa, M. J.; Sterba, J.; Benesch, M.; Gerber, N.; Juhnke, B. O.; Kwiecien, R.; Pietsch, T.; Kool, M.; Clifford, S.; Ellison, D. W.; Giangaspero, F.; Wesseling, P.; Gilles, F.; Gottardo, N.; Finlay, J. L.; Rutkowski, S.; Von Hoff, K.. - In: NEURO-ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1522-8517. - 19:4(2017), pp. 576-585. [10.1093/neuonc/now234]

Evaluation of age-dependent treatment strategies for children and young adults with pineoblastoma: analysis of pooled European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOP-E) and US Head Start data

Giangaspero F.;
2017

Abstract

Background. Pineoblastoma is a rare pineal region brain tumor. Treatment strategies have reflected those for other malignant embryonal brain tumors. Patients and Methods. Original prospective treatment and outcome data from international trial groups were pooled. Cox regression models were developed considering treatment elements as time-dependent covariates. Results. Data on 135 patients with pineoblastoma aged 0.01-20.7 (median 4.9) years were analyzed. Median observation time was 7.3 years. Favorable prognostic factors were age ≥4 years (hazard ratio [HR] for progression-free survival [PFS] 0.270, P < .001) and administration of radiotherapy (HR for PFS 0.282, P < .001). Metastatic disease (HR for PFS 2.015, P = .006), but not postoperative residual tumor, was associated with unfavorable prognosis. In 57 patients <4 years old, 5-year PFS/overall survival (OS) were 11 ± 4%/12 ± 4%. Two patients survived after chemotherapy only, while 3 of 16 treated with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with boost, and 3 of 5 treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and local radiotherapy survived. In 78 patients aged ≥4 years, PFS/OS were 72 ± 7%/73 ± 7% for patients without metastases, and 50 ± 10%/55 ± 10% with metastases. Seventy-three patients received radiotherapy (48 conventionally fractionated CSI, median dose 35.0 [18.0-45.0] Gy, 19 hyperfractionated CSI, 6 local radiotherapy), with (n = 68) or without (n = 6) chemotherapy. The treatment sequence had no impact; application of HDCT had weak impact on survival in older patients. Conclusion. Survival is poor in young children treated without radiotherapy. In these patients, combination of HDCT and local radiotherapy may warrant further evaluation in the absence of more specific or targeted treatments. CSI combined with chemotherapy is effective for older non-metastatic patients.
2017
high-dose chemotherapy; pediatric; pineoblastoma; radiotherapy; treatment; adolescent; adult; antineoplastic agents; brain neoplasms; child; child, preschool; combined modality therapy; databases, factual; disease-free survival; Europe; female; humans; infant; male; pineal gland; pinealoma; prospective studies; treatment outcome; United States; young adult
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Evaluation of age-dependent treatment strategies for children and young adults with pineoblastoma: analysis of pooled European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOP-E) and US Head Start data / Mynarek, M.; Pizer, B.; Dufour, C.; Van Vuurden, D.; Garami, M.; Massimino, M.; Fangusaro, J.; Davidson, T.; Gil-Da-Costa, M. J.; Sterba, J.; Benesch, M.; Gerber, N.; Juhnke, B. O.; Kwiecien, R.; Pietsch, T.; Kool, M.; Clifford, S.; Ellison, D. W.; Giangaspero, F.; Wesseling, P.; Gilles, F.; Gottardo, N.; Finlay, J. L.; Rutkowski, S.; Von Hoff, K.. - In: NEURO-ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1522-8517. - 19:4(2017), pp. 576-585. [10.1093/neuonc/now234]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Mynarek_Evaluation of age-dependent_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://academic.oup.com/neuro-oncology/article/19/4/576/2736386
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.14 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.14 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1301740
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 33
social impact