BACKGROUND: We evaluated the trend of four years (2015 - 2018) of "alert organisms" surveillance carried out at the 450 bed teaching hospital S. Andrea in Rome. METHODS: All patients with an "Alert organism" isolation were screened. In accordance with definitions used by the Centers for Disease Control patients with an "alert organism" isolation were evaluated for infection or colonization, by an infection control team (ICT). RESULTS: Between April 2015 and December 2018 a total 4,762 specimens with "Alert organism" isolation were screened and 1,601 patients were surveyed and included in the study. Overall 780 (48.8%) patients developed an healthcare acquired infection (HAI) at our institution, whereas 311 (19.4%) entered with a community acquired infection, 254 (15.8%) with an infection acquired in another healthcare setting and 256 (16.0%) resulted simply colonized. The 780 patients who developed an HAI at our institution presented 878 infectious episodes and the isolation of 931 microorganisms. C. difficile infections were the most common (27.2%), followed by 21.3% respiratory tract infections, 16.9% urinary tract infections, 15.5% surgical site infections, 12.5% bloodstream infections, 3.6% ulcers and 3.0% others. Among HAI group Gram negatives (54.1%) were more frequent than Gram positives (45.9%), whereas in patients entering in the hospital already with a community infection Gram positives overpassed Gram negatives (58.7% vs. 41.3%; p<0.001). Most common pathogens responsible for HAI were C. difficile (25.6%), Klebsiella spp. (25.5%), MRSA (19.6%) and Acinetobacter spp. (15.3%). Notably 30.0% HAI at other institutions were represented by C. difficile. Impressively, >40% of community acquired infections were related to MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provided some useful insight into the major multi-resistant pathogens epidemiology at our institution. The Authors succeeded in organizing a multidisciplinary ICT that created a partnership feeling with the hospital personnel.
Surveillance of healthcare acquired infections by "alert microorganisms". preliminary results / Santino, I; Teggi, A; Marangi, M; Montesano, M; Petrucca, A; Bertamino, E; Zerbetto, A; Sandorfi, F; Iachini, M; Orsi, G B. - In: ANNALI DI IGIENE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA E DI COMUNITÀ. - ISSN 1120-9135. - 31:5(2019), pp. 414-422. [10.7416/ai.2019.2303]
Surveillance of healthcare acquired infections by "alert microorganisms". preliminary results
Santino, I;Teggi, A;Marangi, M;Petrucca, A;Bertamino, E;Zerbetto, A;Sandorfi, F;Iachini, M;Orsi, G B
Ultimo
2019
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the trend of four years (2015 - 2018) of "alert organisms" surveillance carried out at the 450 bed teaching hospital S. Andrea in Rome. METHODS: All patients with an "Alert organism" isolation were screened. In accordance with definitions used by the Centers for Disease Control patients with an "alert organism" isolation were evaluated for infection or colonization, by an infection control team (ICT). RESULTS: Between April 2015 and December 2018 a total 4,762 specimens with "Alert organism" isolation were screened and 1,601 patients were surveyed and included in the study. Overall 780 (48.8%) patients developed an healthcare acquired infection (HAI) at our institution, whereas 311 (19.4%) entered with a community acquired infection, 254 (15.8%) with an infection acquired in another healthcare setting and 256 (16.0%) resulted simply colonized. The 780 patients who developed an HAI at our institution presented 878 infectious episodes and the isolation of 931 microorganisms. C. difficile infections were the most common (27.2%), followed by 21.3% respiratory tract infections, 16.9% urinary tract infections, 15.5% surgical site infections, 12.5% bloodstream infections, 3.6% ulcers and 3.0% others. Among HAI group Gram negatives (54.1%) were more frequent than Gram positives (45.9%), whereas in patients entering in the hospital already with a community infection Gram positives overpassed Gram negatives (58.7% vs. 41.3%; p<0.001). Most common pathogens responsible for HAI were C. difficile (25.6%), Klebsiella spp. (25.5%), MRSA (19.6%) and Acinetobacter spp. (15.3%). Notably 30.0% HAI at other institutions were represented by C. difficile. Impressively, >40% of community acquired infections were related to MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provided some useful insight into the major multi-resistant pathogens epidemiology at our institution. The Authors succeeded in organizing a multidisciplinary ICT that created a partnership feeling with the hospital personnel.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Santino_Surveillance_2019.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
127.98 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
127.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.