We analyzed different parametrizations of structural equation models including interaction terms. The models showed herein (e.g., Joreskog, 1998) are less complex and less computing-demanding than previously proposed parametrizations (e.g., Jaccard & Wan, 1995). Moreover, they have some advantages over the classical multiple regression models using observed variables. We used data from a study on dieting intentions (N = 609 adult women). The theoretical model hypothesizes that intentions to stick to a diet are a function of the main effects of Subjective Norms, Self-efficacies concerning the ability to resist eating temptations, and of the interaction between subjective norms and self-efficacy. Results show that structural equation models outperform hierarchical regression models estimating the interaction effect with higher precision. Pros and cons of the models tested, and avenues for a wider implementation of such models in substantive psychological research are discussed.
Interazioni, regressioni, LISREL: Sviluppi nell’analisi confermativa delle relazioni moltiplicative / Leone, Luigi. - In: TPM. TESTING PSICOMETRIA METODOLOGIA. - ISSN 1720-0121. - 13:(2006), pp. 51-64.
Interazioni, regressioni, LISREL: Sviluppi nell’analisi confermativa delle relazioni moltiplicative
LEONE, Luigi
2006
Abstract
We analyzed different parametrizations of structural equation models including interaction terms. The models showed herein (e.g., Joreskog, 1998) are less complex and less computing-demanding than previously proposed parametrizations (e.g., Jaccard & Wan, 1995). Moreover, they have some advantages over the classical multiple regression models using observed variables. We used data from a study on dieting intentions (N = 609 adult women). The theoretical model hypothesizes that intentions to stick to a diet are a function of the main effects of Subjective Norms, Self-efficacies concerning the ability to resist eating temptations, and of the interaction between subjective norms and self-efficacy. Results show that structural equation models outperform hierarchical regression models estimating the interaction effect with higher precision. Pros and cons of the models tested, and avenues for a wider implementation of such models in substantive psychological research are discussed.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.