OsteoArthritis (OA) is a theme currently representing an emerging topic for its increasing incidence. It is well known that it is a chronic disease that could lead to important long-lasting disability; this generates increasing costs for the health care system. OA treatment options vary: localization, aetiology, grading and symptomatology should be considered before choosing the most adequate therapy. Currently, a modern approach to managing OA involves SYmptomatic Slow Acting Drugs in Osteo-Arthritis (SYSADOAs). However, while all preparations may claim to deliver a therapeutic level of glucosamine or chondroitin, not all of them are supported by clinical evidence. Recently the European Society for Clinical and Economic aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal diseases (ESCEO), produced an evidenced based document providing practitioners with the latest clinical and economic informations, thereby allowing them to optimize the management of knee OA. According to this report, only crystalline glucosamine sulphate and the pharmaceutical-grade chondroitin sulphate are considered as effective in the first line approach to treating knee OA as an alternative drug to acetaminophen. However, some OA guidelines do not agree are not concordant in recommending the use of SYSADOA, perhaps because they are generally considered as a class and distinctions among formulations aren't made.

Appropriateness of clinical criteria for the use of symptomatic slow-acting drug for osteoarthritis (SYSADOA). A Delphi method consensus initiative among experts in Italy / Bernetti, Andrea; Mangone, Massimiliano; Villani, Ciro; Alviti, Federica; Valeo, Massimo; Grassi, Maria Caterina; Migliore, Alberto; Viora, Ugo; Adriani, Ezio; Quirino, Nicola; Fioravanti, Antonella; Paoloni, Marco. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE. - ISSN 1973-9095. - 55:5(2019), pp. 658-664. [10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05633-8]

Appropriateness of clinical criteria for the use of symptomatic slow-acting drug for osteoarthritis (SYSADOA). A Delphi method consensus initiative among experts in Italy

Bernetti, Andrea
;
Mangone, Massimiliano;Villani, Ciro;Alviti, Federica;Valeo, Massimo;Grassi, Maria Caterina;Migliore, Alberto;Fioravanti, Antonella;Paoloni, Marco
2019

Abstract

OsteoArthritis (OA) is a theme currently representing an emerging topic for its increasing incidence. It is well known that it is a chronic disease that could lead to important long-lasting disability; this generates increasing costs for the health care system. OA treatment options vary: localization, aetiology, grading and symptomatology should be considered before choosing the most adequate therapy. Currently, a modern approach to managing OA involves SYmptomatic Slow Acting Drugs in Osteo-Arthritis (SYSADOAs). However, while all preparations may claim to deliver a therapeutic level of glucosamine or chondroitin, not all of them are supported by clinical evidence. Recently the European Society for Clinical and Economic aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal diseases (ESCEO), produced an evidenced based document providing practitioners with the latest clinical and economic informations, thereby allowing them to optimize the management of knee OA. According to this report, only crystalline glucosamine sulphate and the pharmaceutical-grade chondroitin sulphate are considered as effective in the first line approach to treating knee OA as an alternative drug to acetaminophen. However, some OA guidelines do not agree are not concordant in recommending the use of SYSADOA, perhaps because they are generally considered as a class and distinctions among formulations aren't made.
2019
sysadoa; osteoarthritis; Delphi method consensus
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Appropriateness of clinical criteria for the use of symptomatic slow-acting drug for osteoarthritis (SYSADOA). A Delphi method consensus initiative among experts in Italy / Bernetti, Andrea; Mangone, Massimiliano; Villani, Ciro; Alviti, Federica; Valeo, Massimo; Grassi, Maria Caterina; Migliore, Alberto; Viora, Ugo; Adriani, Ezio; Quirino, Nicola; Fioravanti, Antonella; Paoloni, Marco. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE. - ISSN 1973-9095. - 55:5(2019), pp. 658-664. [10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05633-8]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Bernetti_Appropriateness _2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 382.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
382.23 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1292393
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact