Background: A major question that received the attention of numerous theoretical and empirical studies during the past few decades relates to the issue of output growth decomposition and the sources of economic growth. The literature focuses on two sources of growth: factor accumulation (mainly physical capital) and total factor productivity (TFP) growth, presenting inconclusive results as to the relative importance of each. Aim: This article investigates the relative importance of physical capital accumulation and TFP in explaining output growth in 36 sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries over 1996–2014. The possibility of TFP-induced input effects is tested in order to better assess the role of TFP in total output growth. Setting: 36 SSA countries over the period 1996–2014. Method: The article uses a stochastic frontier analysis, an empirical methodology that decomposes total output growth into input growth, technological change and technical efficiency change. Results: The contribution of physical capital to total growth exceeds that of TFP in 22 out of the 36 countries. The result withstands issues of TFP-induced effects on inputs. Conclusion: A large share of growth in SSA is explained by factor inputs and not by TFP. There is therefore room for TFP to further increase growth in SSA. In order to create more opportunities for growth, SSA countries ought to invest in productivity-enhancing factors.

Physical capital, total factor productivity, and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa / Garzarelli, Giampaolo; Rim LImam, Yasmina. - In: SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES. - ISSN 2222-3436. - (2019), pp. 1-10. [10.4102/sajems.v22i1.2309]

Physical capital, total factor productivity, and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa

Giampaolo Garzarelli
Primo
;
2019

Abstract

Background: A major question that received the attention of numerous theoretical and empirical studies during the past few decades relates to the issue of output growth decomposition and the sources of economic growth. The literature focuses on two sources of growth: factor accumulation (mainly physical capital) and total factor productivity (TFP) growth, presenting inconclusive results as to the relative importance of each. Aim: This article investigates the relative importance of physical capital accumulation and TFP in explaining output growth in 36 sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries over 1996–2014. The possibility of TFP-induced input effects is tested in order to better assess the role of TFP in total output growth. Setting: 36 SSA countries over the period 1996–2014. Method: The article uses a stochastic frontier analysis, an empirical methodology that decomposes total output growth into input growth, technological change and technical efficiency change. Results: The contribution of physical capital to total growth exceeds that of TFP in 22 out of the 36 countries. The result withstands issues of TFP-induced effects on inputs. Conclusion: A large share of growth in SSA is explained by factor inputs and not by TFP. There is therefore room for TFP to further increase growth in SSA. In order to create more opportunities for growth, SSA countries ought to invest in productivity-enhancing factors.
2019
economic growth; factor accumulation; stochastic frontier; sub-saharan Africa; total factor productivity
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Physical capital, total factor productivity, and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa / Garzarelli, Giampaolo; Rim LImam, Yasmina. - In: SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES. - ISSN 2222-3436. - (2019), pp. 1-10. [10.4102/sajems.v22i1.2309]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
SAJEMS.2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 744.38 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
744.38 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1291748
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact