The paper analyses Max Müller’s criticism of the imitative theory of language upheld by the English philologist Hensleigh Wedgwood (1803–1891) and later endorsed by Charles Darwin in The Descent of Man. By recalling Müller’s and Wedgwood’s theoretical backgrounds and epistemological aims, it argues that their disagreement was more apparent than real, reflecting two different concepts of imitation: imitation as a strictly human capability for Wedgwood and as a broad cross-species behaviour for Max Müller, who critically foresaw the evolutionist challenge to the alleged uniqueness of human language. Darwin used Wedgwood’s theory of imitation in order to demonstrate an evolutionary continuity between humans and non-human animals, thus confirming Müller’s worries and partially betraying Wedgwood’s own beliefs.

"Language Is Our Rubicon”: Max Müller’s Quarrel with Hensleigh Wedgwood / Piattelli, Michela. - In: PUBLICATIONS OF THE ENGLISH GOETHE SOCIETY. - ISSN 0959-3683. - (2016), pp. 98-109. (Intervento presentato al convegno Friedrich Max Müller and the Role of Philology in Victorian Thought tenutosi a German Historical Institute London) [10.1080/09593683.2016.1224511].

"Language Is Our Rubicon”: Max Müller’s Quarrel with Hensleigh Wedgwood

Piattelli, Michela
2016

Abstract

The paper analyses Max Müller’s criticism of the imitative theory of language upheld by the English philologist Hensleigh Wedgwood (1803–1891) and later endorsed by Charles Darwin in The Descent of Man. By recalling Müller’s and Wedgwood’s theoretical backgrounds and epistemological aims, it argues that their disagreement was more apparent than real, reflecting two different concepts of imitation: imitation as a strictly human capability for Wedgwood and as a broad cross-species behaviour for Max Müller, who critically foresaw the evolutionist challenge to the alleged uniqueness of human language. Darwin used Wedgwood’s theory of imitation in order to demonstrate an evolutionary continuity between humans and non-human animals, thus confirming Müller’s worries and partially betraying Wedgwood’s own beliefs.
2016
Friedrich Max Müller and the Role of Philology in Victorian Thought
Friedrich Max Müller; Hensleigh Wedgwood; Charles Darwin; origin of language; philology; non-human animals
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04c Atto di convegno in rivista
"Language Is Our Rubicon”: Max Müller’s Quarrel with Hensleigh Wedgwood / Piattelli, Michela. - In: PUBLICATIONS OF THE ENGLISH GOETHE SOCIETY. - ISSN 0959-3683. - (2016), pp. 98-109. (Intervento presentato al convegno Friedrich Max Müller and the Role of Philology in Victorian Thought tenutosi a German Historical Institute London) [10.1080/09593683.2016.1224511].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Piattelli_Language_2016.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 344.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
344.28 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1291219
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact