The FLURESP project is a public health project funded by the European Commission with the objective to design a methodological approach in order to compare the cost-effectiveness of existing public health measures against human influenza pandemics in four target countries: France, Italy, Poland and Romania. This article presents the results relevant to the French health system using a data set specifically collected for this purpose. METHODS: Eighteen public health interventions against human influenza pandemics were selected. Additionally, two public-health criteria were considered: 'achieving mortality reduction ≥40%' and 'achieving morbidity reduction ≥30%'. Costs and effectiveness data sources include existing reports, publications and expert opinions. Cost distributions were taken into account using a uniform distribution, according to the French health system. RESULTS: Using reduction of mortality as an effectiveness criterion, the most cost-effective options was 'implementation of new equipment of Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) equipment'. Targeting vaccination to health professionals appeared more cost-effective than vaccination programs targeting at risk populations. Concerning antiviral distribution programs, curative programs appeared more cost-effective than preventive programs. Using reduction of morbidity as effectiveness criterion, the most cost-effective option was 'implementation of new equipment ECMO'. Vaccination programs targeting the general population appeared more cost-effective than both vaccination programs of health professionals or at-risk populations. Curative antiviral programs appeared more cost-effective than preventive distribution programs, whatever the pandemic scenario. CONCLUSION: Intervention strategies against human influenza pandemics impose a substantial economic burden, suggesting a need to develop public-health cost-effectiveness assessments across countries.

Cost-effectiveness of public health interventions against human influenza pandemics in France. a methodological contribution from the FLURESP European Commission project / Beresniak, Ariel; Rizzo, Caterina; Oxford, John; Goryński, Paweł; Pistol, Adriana; Fabiani, Massimo; Napoli, Christian; Barral, Marta; Niddam, Laurent; Bounekkar, Ahmed; Bonnevay, Stephane; Lionis, Christos; Gauci, Charmaine; Bremond, Dominique. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 1101-1262. - May 5(2019), pp. 1-7. [10.1093/eurpub/ckz074]

Cost-effectiveness of public health interventions against human influenza pandemics in France. a methodological contribution from the FLURESP European Commission project

Napoli, Christian;
2019

Abstract

The FLURESP project is a public health project funded by the European Commission with the objective to design a methodological approach in order to compare the cost-effectiveness of existing public health measures against human influenza pandemics in four target countries: France, Italy, Poland and Romania. This article presents the results relevant to the French health system using a data set specifically collected for this purpose. METHODS: Eighteen public health interventions against human influenza pandemics were selected. Additionally, two public-health criteria were considered: 'achieving mortality reduction ≥40%' and 'achieving morbidity reduction ≥30%'. Costs and effectiveness data sources include existing reports, publications and expert opinions. Cost distributions were taken into account using a uniform distribution, according to the French health system. RESULTS: Using reduction of mortality as an effectiveness criterion, the most cost-effective options was 'implementation of new equipment of Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) equipment'. Targeting vaccination to health professionals appeared more cost-effective than vaccination programs targeting at risk populations. Concerning antiviral distribution programs, curative programs appeared more cost-effective than preventive programs. Using reduction of morbidity as effectiveness criterion, the most cost-effective option was 'implementation of new equipment ECMO'. Vaccination programs targeting the general population appeared more cost-effective than both vaccination programs of health professionals or at-risk populations. Curative antiviral programs appeared more cost-effective than preventive distribution programs, whatever the pandemic scenario. CONCLUSION: Intervention strategies against human influenza pandemics impose a substantial economic burden, suggesting a need to develop public-health cost-effectiveness assessments across countries.
2019
public health interventions against human influenza pandemics; cost-benefit analyses; electronic health records; clinical trials
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Cost-effectiveness of public health interventions against human influenza pandemics in France. a methodological contribution from the FLURESP European Commission project / Beresniak, Ariel; Rizzo, Caterina; Oxford, John; Goryński, Paweł; Pistol, Adriana; Fabiani, Massimo; Napoli, Christian; Barral, Marta; Niddam, Laurent; Bounekkar, Ahmed; Bonnevay, Stephane; Lionis, Christos; Gauci, Charmaine; Bremond, Dominique. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 1101-1262. - May 5(2019), pp. 1-7. [10.1093/eurpub/ckz074]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Beresniak_Cost-effectiveness_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 118.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
118.59 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1287924
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact