Liver transplantation (LT) has originally been designed to treat hepatobiliary malignancies. The initial results of LT for hepatocellular cancer (HCC) were, however, dismal this mainly due to the poor patient selection procedure. Better surgical and perioperative care and, especially, the refinement of selection criteria led to a major improvement of results, making HCC nowadays (again!) one of the leading indications for LT. This evolution is clearly shown by the innumerable reports aiming to further extend inclusion criteria for LT in HCC patients. Nonetheless, the vast majority of papers only deals with morphologic (tumour diameter and number) and (only recently) biologic (tumour markers and response to locoregional treatment) parameters to do so. Curiously enough, the role of both the immune competent state of the recipient as well as the impact of both immunosuppression (IS) type and load has been very poorly addressed in this context, even if it has been shown for a long time, based on both basic and clinical research, that they all play a key role in the outcome of any oncologic treatment and in the development of de novo as well as recurrent tumours. This chapter aims to give, after a short introductive note about the currently used inclusion criteria of HCC patients for LT and about the role of IS in carcinogenesis, a comprehensive overview of the actual literature related to the impact of different immunosuppressive drugs and schemes on outcome of LT in HCC recipients. Unfortunately, up to now solid conclusions cannot be drawn due to the lack of high-level evidence studies caused by the heterogeneity of the studied patient cohorts and the lack of prospectively designed and randomized studies. Based on long-term personal experience with immunosuppressive handling in LT some proposals for further clinical research and practice are put forward. The strategy of curtailing and minimising IS should be explored in the growing field of transplant oncology taking thereby into account the immunological privilege of the liver allograft. These strategies will become more and more compelling when further extending the indications in which adjuvant chemotherapy will probably become an inherent part of the therapeutic scheme of HCC liver recipients.

Hepatocellular cancer and recurrence after liver transplantation. What about the impact of immunosuppression? / Lerut, Jan; Iesari, Samuele; Foguenne, Maxime; Lai, Quirino. - In: TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY. - ISSN 2415-1289. - 2:OCT(2017), p. 80. [10.21037/tgh.2017.09.06]

Hepatocellular cancer and recurrence after liver transplantation. What about the impact of immunosuppression?

Lai, Quirino
2017

Abstract

Liver transplantation (LT) has originally been designed to treat hepatobiliary malignancies. The initial results of LT for hepatocellular cancer (HCC) were, however, dismal this mainly due to the poor patient selection procedure. Better surgical and perioperative care and, especially, the refinement of selection criteria led to a major improvement of results, making HCC nowadays (again!) one of the leading indications for LT. This evolution is clearly shown by the innumerable reports aiming to further extend inclusion criteria for LT in HCC patients. Nonetheless, the vast majority of papers only deals with morphologic (tumour diameter and number) and (only recently) biologic (tumour markers and response to locoregional treatment) parameters to do so. Curiously enough, the role of both the immune competent state of the recipient as well as the impact of both immunosuppression (IS) type and load has been very poorly addressed in this context, even if it has been shown for a long time, based on both basic and clinical research, that they all play a key role in the outcome of any oncologic treatment and in the development of de novo as well as recurrent tumours. This chapter aims to give, after a short introductive note about the currently used inclusion criteria of HCC patients for LT and about the role of IS in carcinogenesis, a comprehensive overview of the actual literature related to the impact of different immunosuppressive drugs and schemes on outcome of LT in HCC recipients. Unfortunately, up to now solid conclusions cannot be drawn due to the lack of high-level evidence studies caused by the heterogeneity of the studied patient cohorts and the lack of prospectively designed and randomized studies. Based on long-term personal experience with immunosuppressive handling in LT some proposals for further clinical research and practice are put forward. The strategy of curtailing and minimising IS should be explored in the growing field of transplant oncology taking thereby into account the immunological privilege of the liver allograft. These strategies will become more and more compelling when further extending the indications in which adjuvant chemotherapy will probably become an inherent part of the therapeutic scheme of HCC liver recipients.
2017
Antimetabolites; Azathioprine (AZA); Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI); Cyclosporine a (CYA); Everolimus (EVL); Hepatocellular cancer (HCC); Immunosuppression (IS); Is minimization; Liver cancer; Liver transplantation (LT); Mtor inhibitor; Mycophenolic acid (MPA); Sirolimus (srl); Steroid avoidance; Steroids; Tacrolimus (TAC); Tumour recurrence; Hepatology; Gastroenterology
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
Hepatocellular cancer and recurrence after liver transplantation. What about the impact of immunosuppression? / Lerut, Jan; Iesari, Samuele; Foguenne, Maxime; Lai, Quirino. - In: TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY. - ISSN 2415-1289. - 2:OCT(2017), p. 80. [10.21037/tgh.2017.09.06]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Lerut_Immunosuppression_2107.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 249.7 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
249.7 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1287435
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact