AimsOne of the main limitations for an effective cell therapy for the heart is the poor cell engraftment after implantation, which is partly due to a large percentage of cell death in the hostile myocardium. In the present study, we investigated the utilization of necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) as a possible attenuator of cell death in cardiomyocyte progenitor cells (CMPCs).Methods and resultsIn a mouse model of myocardial infarction, survival of CMPCs 3 days after intra-myocardial injection was 39 ± 9% higher in cells pretreated with the Nec-1 compound. However, the increase in cell number was not sustained over 28 days, and did not translate into improved cardiac function (ejection fraction %, 20.6 ± 2.1 vs. 21.4 ± 2.5 for vehicle and Nec-1-treated CMPC, respectively). Nonetheless, Nec-1 rescued CMPCs remained functionally competent.ConclusionA pharmacological pretreatment approach to solely enhance cell survival on the short term does not seem to be effective strategy to improve cardiac cell therapy with CMPCs. © 2013 Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2013.

Increasing short-term cardiomyocyte progenitor cell (CMPC) survival by necrostatin-1 did not further preserve cardiac function / Feyen, D.; Gaetani, R.; Liu, J.; Noort, W.; Martens, A.; Den Ouden, K.; Doevendans, P. A.; Sluijter, J. P. G.. - In: CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH. - ISSN 0008-6363. - 99:1(2013), pp. 83-91. [10.1093/cvr/cvt078]

Increasing short-term cardiomyocyte progenitor cell (CMPC) survival by necrostatin-1 did not further preserve cardiac function

Gaetani R.;Liu J.;Martens A.;
2013

Abstract

AimsOne of the main limitations for an effective cell therapy for the heart is the poor cell engraftment after implantation, which is partly due to a large percentage of cell death in the hostile myocardium. In the present study, we investigated the utilization of necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) as a possible attenuator of cell death in cardiomyocyte progenitor cells (CMPCs).Methods and resultsIn a mouse model of myocardial infarction, survival of CMPCs 3 days after intra-myocardial injection was 39 ± 9% higher in cells pretreated with the Nec-1 compound. However, the increase in cell number was not sustained over 28 days, and did not translate into improved cardiac function (ejection fraction %, 20.6 ± 2.1 vs. 21.4 ± 2.5 for vehicle and Nec-1-treated CMPC, respectively). Nonetheless, Nec-1 rescued CMPCs remained functionally competent.ConclusionA pharmacological pretreatment approach to solely enhance cell survival on the short term does not seem to be effective strategy to improve cardiac cell therapy with CMPCs. © 2013 Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2013.
2013
BLI; Cardiac cell therapy; Cardiac progenitor cells; Cell survival; Necrostatin; Animals; Cell Survival; Cells, Cultured; Disease Models, Animal; Green Fluorescent Proteins; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred NOD; Mice, SCID; Myocardial Infarction; Myocytes, Cardiac; Recovery of Function; Stem Cells; Stroke Volume; Time Factors; Transduction, Genetic; Transfection; Ventricular Function, Left; Stem Cell Transplantation
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Increasing short-term cardiomyocyte progenitor cell (CMPC) survival by necrostatin-1 did not further preserve cardiac function / Feyen, D.; Gaetani, R.; Liu, J.; Noort, W.; Martens, A.; Den Ouden, K.; Doevendans, P. A.; Sluijter, J. P. G.. - In: CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH. - ISSN 0008-6363. - 99:1(2013), pp. 83-91. [10.1093/cvr/cvt078]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1282290
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact