INTRODUCTION: Race is an important health determinant and should adequately be considered in research and drug development protocols targeting Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A systematic review of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the currently marketed treatments for AD was conducted with the aim of 1) documenting the reporting of race, and 2) exploring the impact of race on the efficacy and safety/tolerability of the considered medications. RESULTS: Overall, 59.2% of the 49 retained RCTs reported information concerning the race of participants. Only a striking minority of enrolled patients was constituted of blacks and Hispanics. None on the retained studies reported results on the efficacy and safety/tolerability of the tested treatment separately for racial groups nor performed sensitivity analyses accounting for the race of participants. DISCUSSION: Race has insufficiently been reported in previous interventional studies on AD. Its potential association with the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of the tested medications has completely been neglected.

Race reporting and disparities in clinical trials on Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review / Canevelli, M; Bruno, G; Grande, G; Quarata, F; Raganato, R; Remiddi, F; Valletta, M; Zaccaria, V; Vanacore, N; Cesari, M.. - In: NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS. - ISSN 0149-7634. - 101:June 2019(2019), pp. 122-128. [10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.020]

Race reporting and disparities in clinical trials on Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review

Canevelli M
;
Bruno G;Raganato R;Valletta M;Zaccaria V;Vanacore N;
2019

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Race is an important health determinant and should adequately be considered in research and drug development protocols targeting Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A systematic review of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the currently marketed treatments for AD was conducted with the aim of 1) documenting the reporting of race, and 2) exploring the impact of race on the efficacy and safety/tolerability of the considered medications. RESULTS: Overall, 59.2% of the 49 retained RCTs reported information concerning the race of participants. Only a striking minority of enrolled patients was constituted of blacks and Hispanics. None on the retained studies reported results on the efficacy and safety/tolerability of the tested treatment separately for racial groups nor performed sensitivity analyses accounting for the race of participants. DISCUSSION: Race has insufficiently been reported in previous interventional studies on AD. Its potential association with the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of the tested medications has completely been neglected.
2019
Alzheimer’s disease; dementia; external validity; precision medicine; race; randomized controlled trial
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Race reporting and disparities in clinical trials on Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review / Canevelli, M; Bruno, G; Grande, G; Quarata, F; Raganato, R; Remiddi, F; Valletta, M; Zaccaria, V; Vanacore, N; Cesari, M.. - In: NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS. - ISSN 0149-7634. - 101:June 2019(2019), pp. 122-128. [10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.020]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Canevelli_race-reporting-disparities_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.33 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.33 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1279114
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 25
  • Scopus 41
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact