Frailty is a clinical condition among older adults defined as the loss of resources in one or more domains (i.e., physical, psychological and social domains) of individual functioning. In frail subjects emergency situations and mobility levels need to be carefully monitored. This study aimed to: i) evaluate differences in the mobility index (MI) provided by ADAMO system, an innovative remote monitoring device for older adults; ii) compare the association of the MI and a traditional physical measure with frailty.

A comparison between an ICT tool and a traditional physical measure for frailty evaluation in older adults / Mulasso, Anna; Brustio, Paolo Riccardo; Rainoldi, Alberto; Zia, Gianluca; Feletti, Luca; N'Dja, Aurèle; Del Signore, Susanna; Poggiogalle, Eleonora; Luisi, Federica; Donini, Lorenzo Maria. - In: BMC GERIATRICS. - ISSN 1471-2318. - 19:1(2019), p. 88. [10.1186/s12877-019-1089-z]

A comparison between an ICT tool and a traditional physical measure for frailty evaluation in older adults

Poggiogalle, Eleonora;Donini, Lorenzo Maria
2019

Abstract

Frailty is a clinical condition among older adults defined as the loss of resources in one or more domains (i.e., physical, psychological and social domains) of individual functioning. In frail subjects emergency situations and mobility levels need to be carefully monitored. This study aimed to: i) evaluate differences in the mobility index (MI) provided by ADAMO system, an innovative remote monitoring device for older adults; ii) compare the association of the MI and a traditional physical measure with frailty.
2019
Health status; ICT tool; physical functioning; physical measure; sarcopenia
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
A comparison between an ICT tool and a traditional physical measure for frailty evaluation in older adults / Mulasso, Anna; Brustio, Paolo Riccardo; Rainoldi, Alberto; Zia, Gianluca; Feletti, Luca; N'Dja, Aurèle; Del Signore, Susanna; Poggiogalle, Eleonora; Luisi, Federica; Donini, Lorenzo Maria. - In: BMC GERIATRICS. - ISSN 1471-2318. - 19:1(2019), p. 88. [10.1186/s12877-019-1089-z]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Mulasso_Comparision-between_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 587.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
587.02 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1276262
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact