The Web has increasingly become the major source of information about health care, and patients who need to undergo breast reconstruction often use the internet to acquire an initial knowledge on the subject. We would like to present our study that investigates the quality of published information on pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. We searched the term ‘‘Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction’’ on Google and Yahoo. Forty-two web sites were selected and underwent qualitative and quantitative assessment using the expanded EQIP tool. The analysis of document contents showed a critical lack of information about qualitative risks and side-effects descriptions, treatment of potential complications, alert signs for the patient and precautions that the patient may take. Health professionals should inform patients about the potential difficulties of identifying reliable informational web sites about pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. The quality of available information should be improved, especially the important topics included in the content data section of the modified EQIP tool

The new trend of pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. An objective evaluation of the quality of online information for patients undergoing breast reconstruction / Marcasciano, M.; Frattaroli, J.; Mori, F. L. R.; Lo Torto, F.; Fioramonti, P.; Cavalieri, E.; Kaciulyte, J.; Greco, M.; Casella, D.; Ribuffo, D.. - In: AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY. - ISSN 0364-216X. - 43:3(2019), pp. 593-599. [10.1007/s00266-019-01311-x]

The new trend of pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. An objective evaluation of the quality of online information for patients undergoing breast reconstruction

M. Marcasciano
;
J. Frattaroli;F. L. R. Mori;F. Lo Torto;P. Fioramonti;E. Cavalieri
Data Curation
;
J. Kaciulyte;D. Casella;D. Ribuffo
2019

Abstract

The Web has increasingly become the major source of information about health care, and patients who need to undergo breast reconstruction often use the internet to acquire an initial knowledge on the subject. We would like to present our study that investigates the quality of published information on pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. We searched the term ‘‘Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction’’ on Google and Yahoo. Forty-two web sites were selected and underwent qualitative and quantitative assessment using the expanded EQIP tool. The analysis of document contents showed a critical lack of information about qualitative risks and side-effects descriptions, treatment of potential complications, alert signs for the patient and precautions that the patient may take. Health professionals should inform patients about the potential difficulties of identifying reliable informational web sites about pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. The quality of available information should be improved, especially the important topics included in the content data section of the modified EQIP tool
2019
Immediate breast reconstruction Pre-pectoral implant Equip test Breast cancer
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The new trend of pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. An objective evaluation of the quality of online information for patients undergoing breast reconstruction / Marcasciano, M.; Frattaroli, J.; Mori, F. L. R.; Lo Torto, F.; Fioramonti, P.; Cavalieri, E.; Kaciulyte, J.; Greco, M.; Casella, D.; Ribuffo, D.. - In: AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY. - ISSN 0364-216X. - 43:3(2019), pp. 593-599. [10.1007/s00266-019-01311-x]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Marcasciano_Prepectoral-breast-reconstruction_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 211.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
211.8 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1274473
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact