To prevent invasive fungal disease (IFD) in adult patients undergoing remission-induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Objectives: To prevent invasive fungal disease (IFD) in adult patients undergoing remission-induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Patients and methods: In a double-blind multicentre Phase 3 study, patients received prophylactic liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) at 5 mg/kg intravenously or placebo twice weekly in a 2: 1 random allocation during remission-induction treatment. The primary endpoint was the development of proven or probable IFD. Secondary endpoints included those focused on the safety and tolerability of prophylactic L-AMB. Results: Three hundred and fifty-five patients from 86 centres in Europe and South America received at least one dose of L-AMB (n = 237) or placebo (n = 118). Rates of proven and probable IFD assessed independently were 7.9%(18/228) in the L-AMB group and 11.7%(13/111) in the placebo group (P = 0.24). Rates of possible IFD were 4.8% (11/228) in the L-AMB and 5.4% (6/111) in the placebo group (P = 0.82). The remission-induction phase was a median of 22 days for both groups. Overall mortality was similar between the groups: 7.2% (17/237) for L-AMB and 6.8% (8/118) for placebo (P = 1.00). Hypokalaemia and creatinine increase were significantly more frequent with L-AMB. Conclusions: The IFD rate among adult patients undergoing remission-induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed ALL was 11.7% in the placebo group, andwas not significantly different in patients receiving L-AMB, suggesting that the L-AMB regimen studied is not effective as prophylaxis against IFD. The IFD rate appears higher than previously reported, warranting further investigation. Tolerability of L-AMB was what might be expected. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal antifungal strategy during remission-induction chemotherapy of ALL.

Randomized comparison of liposomal amphotericin B versus placebo to prevent invasive mycoses in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia / Cornely, O.A., Leguay, T., Maertens, J., Vehreschild, M.J.G.T., Anagnostopoulos, A., Castagnola, C., Verga, L., Rieger, C., Kondakci, M., Härter, G., Duarte, R.F., Allione, B., Cordonnier, C., Heussel, C.P., Morrissey, C.O., Agrawal, S.G., Donnelly, J.P., Bresnik, M., Hawkins, M.J., Garner, W., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY. - ISSN 0305-7453. - 72:8(2017), pp. 2359-2367. [10.1093/jac/dkx133]

Randomized comparison of liposomal amphotericin B versus placebo to prevent invasive mycoses in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Gentile, Giuseppe
Membro del Collaboration Group
2017

Abstract

To prevent invasive fungal disease (IFD) in adult patients undergoing remission-induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Objectives: To prevent invasive fungal disease (IFD) in adult patients undergoing remission-induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Patients and methods: In a double-blind multicentre Phase 3 study, patients received prophylactic liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) at 5 mg/kg intravenously or placebo twice weekly in a 2: 1 random allocation during remission-induction treatment. The primary endpoint was the development of proven or probable IFD. Secondary endpoints included those focused on the safety and tolerability of prophylactic L-AMB. Results: Three hundred and fifty-five patients from 86 centres in Europe and South America received at least one dose of L-AMB (n = 237) or placebo (n = 118). Rates of proven and probable IFD assessed independently were 7.9%(18/228) in the L-AMB group and 11.7%(13/111) in the placebo group (P = 0.24). Rates of possible IFD were 4.8% (11/228) in the L-AMB and 5.4% (6/111) in the placebo group (P = 0.82). The remission-induction phase was a median of 22 days for both groups. Overall mortality was similar between the groups: 7.2% (17/237) for L-AMB and 6.8% (8/118) for placebo (P = 1.00). Hypokalaemia and creatinine increase were significantly more frequent with L-AMB. Conclusions: The IFD rate among adult patients undergoing remission-induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed ALL was 11.7% in the placebo group, andwas not significantly different in patients receiving L-AMB, suggesting that the L-AMB regimen studied is not effective as prophylaxis against IFD. The IFD rate appears higher than previously reported, warranting further investigation. Tolerability of L-AMB was what might be expected. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal antifungal strategy during remission-induction chemotherapy of ALL.
2017
Administration, Intravenous; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amphotericin B; Antifungal Agents; Chemoprevention; Double-Blind Method; Europe; Female; Humans; Invasive Fungal Infections; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; South America; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Randomized comparison of liposomal amphotericin B versus placebo to prevent invasive mycoses in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia / Cornely, O.A., Leguay, T., Maertens, J., Vehreschild, M.J.G.T., Anagnostopoulos, A., Castagnola, C., Verga, L., Rieger, C., Kondakci, M., Härter, G., Duarte, R.F., Allione, B., Cordonnier, C., Heussel, C.P., Morrissey, C.O., Agrawal, S.G., Donnelly, J.P., Bresnik, M., Hawkins, M.J., Garner, W., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY. - ISSN 0305-7453. - 72:8(2017), pp. 2359-2367. [10.1093/jac/dkx133]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cornely_liposomal-placebo_2017.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 286.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
286.61 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1271528
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 35
  • Scopus 83
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 74
social impact