Anorogenic magmatism of the circum-Mediterranean area (the Tyrrhenian Sea, Sardinia, Sicily Channel, and the Middle East) and of continental Europe (the French Massif Central, Eifel, the Bohemian Massif, and the Pannonian basin) has been proposed to be related to the presence of one or more mantle plumes. Such conclusions based on geochemical data and seismic tomography are not fully justified because (1) a given chemical and isotopic composition of a magma can be explained by different petrogenetic models, (2) a given petrogenetic process can produce magmas with different chemical and isotopic composition, (3) tomographic studies do not furnish unique results (i.e., different models give different results), and (4) the commonly adopted interpretation of seismic wave velocity anomalies exclusively in terms of temperature is not unique; velocities are also dependent on other parameters, such as composition, melting, anisotropy, and anelasticity. Tomography and geochemistry are powerful tools but must be used in an interdisciplinary way, in combination with ge- odynamics and structural geology. Alone they cannot provide conclusive evidence for or against the existence of mantle plumes. The existence of large and/or extensive thermal anomalies under Europe is here considered unnecessary, because other models, based on the existence of upper-mantle heterogeneity, can explain the major-element, trace-element, and isotopic variability of the magmas. Volcanism in central Europe (the French Massif Central, Germany, and the Bohemian Massif) is concentrated in Cenozoic rifted areas and is here interpreted as the result of passive asthenosphere upwelling driven by decompression. Similarly, anorogenic magmatism in Sardinia, the Tyrrhenian Sea, and the Pannonian basin is explained as the result of lithospheric stretching in a back-arc geodynamic setting. The most important factors determining the locus and, in part, the geochemical characteristics of magmatic activity are the Moho and the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary depths. Where both are shallowed by tectonic processes (e.g., in rift zones or back-arc basins), passive upwelling of asthenospheric mantle can explain the mag- matic activity. © 2007 The Geological Society of America.

Phantom plumes in Europe and the circum-Mediterranean region / Lustrino, Michele; Carminati, Eugenio Ambrogio Maria. - 430(2007), pp. 723-745. - SPECIAL PAPER - GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA. [10.1130/2007.2430(33)].

Phantom plumes in Europe and the circum-Mediterranean region

LUSTRINO, Michele;CARMINATI, Eugenio Ambrogio Maria
2007

Abstract

Anorogenic magmatism of the circum-Mediterranean area (the Tyrrhenian Sea, Sardinia, Sicily Channel, and the Middle East) and of continental Europe (the French Massif Central, Eifel, the Bohemian Massif, and the Pannonian basin) has been proposed to be related to the presence of one or more mantle plumes. Such conclusions based on geochemical data and seismic tomography are not fully justified because (1) a given chemical and isotopic composition of a magma can be explained by different petrogenetic models, (2) a given petrogenetic process can produce magmas with different chemical and isotopic composition, (3) tomographic studies do not furnish unique results (i.e., different models give different results), and (4) the commonly adopted interpretation of seismic wave velocity anomalies exclusively in terms of temperature is not unique; velocities are also dependent on other parameters, such as composition, melting, anisotropy, and anelasticity. Tomography and geochemistry are powerful tools but must be used in an interdisciplinary way, in combination with ge- odynamics and structural geology. Alone they cannot provide conclusive evidence for or against the existence of mantle plumes. The existence of large and/or extensive thermal anomalies under Europe is here considered unnecessary, because other models, based on the existence of upper-mantle heterogeneity, can explain the major-element, trace-element, and isotopic variability of the magmas. Volcanism in central Europe (the French Massif Central, Germany, and the Bohemian Massif) is concentrated in Cenozoic rifted areas and is here interpreted as the result of passive asthenosphere upwelling driven by decompression. Similarly, anorogenic magmatism in Sardinia, the Tyrrhenian Sea, and the Pannonian basin is explained as the result of lithospheric stretching in a back-arc geodynamic setting. The most important factors determining the locus and, in part, the geochemical characteristics of magmatic activity are the Moho and the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary depths. Where both are shallowed by tectonic processes (e.g., in rift zones or back-arc basins), passive upwelling of asthenospheric mantle can explain the mag- matic activity. © 2007 The Geological Society of America.
2007
GSA Special Papers 2007
9780813724300
geodynamics; petrology; lithosphere; mediterranean; mantle plume
02 Pubblicazione su volume::02a Capitolo o Articolo
Phantom plumes in Europe and the circum-Mediterranean region / Lustrino, Michele; Carminati, Eugenio Ambrogio Maria. - 430(2007), pp. 723-745. - SPECIAL PAPER - GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA. [10.1130/2007.2430(33)].
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/126239
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact