Demand for models in biodiversity assessments is rising, but which models are adequate for the task? We propose a set of best-practice standards and detailed guidelines enabling scoring of studies based on species distribution models for use in biodiversity assessments. We reviewed and scored 400 modeling studies over the past 20 years using the proposed standards and guidelines. We detected low model adequacy overall, but with a marked tendency of improvement over time in model building and, to a lesser degree, in biological data and model evaluation. We argue that implementation of agreed-upon standards for models in biodiversity assessments would promote transparency and repeatability, eventually leading to higher quality of the models and the inferences used in assessments. We encourage broad community participation toward the expansion and ongoing development of the proposed standards and guidelines.

Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments / Araújo, Miguel B.; Anderson, Robert P.; Márcia Barbosa, A.; Beale, Colin M.; Dormann, Carsten F.; Early, Regan; Garcia, Raquel A.; Guisan, Antoine; Maiorano, Luigi; Naimi, Babak; O’Hara, Robert B.; Zimmermann, Niklaus E.; Rahbek, Carsten. - In: SCIENCE ADVANCES. - ISSN 2375-2548. - 5:1(2019). [10.1126/sciadv.aat4858]

Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments

Luigi Maiorano;
2019

Abstract

Demand for models in biodiversity assessments is rising, but which models are adequate for the task? We propose a set of best-practice standards and detailed guidelines enabling scoring of studies based on species distribution models for use in biodiversity assessments. We reviewed and scored 400 modeling studies over the past 20 years using the proposed standards and guidelines. We detected low model adequacy overall, but with a marked tendency of improvement over time in model building and, to a lesser degree, in biological data and model evaluation. We argue that implementation of agreed-upon standards for models in biodiversity assessments would promote transparency and repeatability, eventually leading to higher quality of the models and the inferences used in assessments. We encourage broad community participation toward the expansion and ongoing development of the proposed standards and guidelines.
2019
species distribution models; iucn red list; climate-change; conservation priorities; global biodiversity; ecosystem services; extinction risk; sampling bias; niche shift; predictions
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments / Araújo, Miguel B.; Anderson, Robert P.; Márcia Barbosa, A.; Beale, Colin M.; Dormann, Carsten F.; Early, Regan; Garcia, Raquel A.; Guisan, Antoine; Maiorano, Luigi; Naimi, Babak; O’Hara, Robert B.; Zimmermann, Niklaus E.; Rahbek, Carsten. - In: SCIENCE ADVANCES. - ISSN 2375-2548. - 5:1(2019). [10.1126/sciadv.aat4858]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Araujo_Standards2019_.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 848.38 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
848.38 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1259461
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 61
  • Scopus 539
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 476
social impact