Ground displacements caused by underground excavations in densely urbanised areas often requires the adoption of protective techniques to prevent damage to existing buildings. When the tunnel passes to the side of a potentially affected building, tunnelling-induced settlements can be reduced pre-installing a protective barrier between the tunnel and the building. Usually, this mitigation technique is implemented in practice based on empirical knowledge rather than as a result of a rational design process. This paper presents a numerical study to evaluate the efficiency of different schemes of embedded barriers, using numerical analyses as a tool to understand the main mechanisms of soil-barrier interaction. Two- and three-dimensional FE analyses were carried out assuming a continuous embedded diaphragm wall or a discontinuous piled wall. The barrier was assumed of either infinite or finite horizontal extension, to evaluate the minimum extension needed to obtain in a given section a settlement reduction similar to that attained under plane strain conditions. The effects induced by wall installation and those associated to the presence of a pre-existing building were also accounted for. The results of the analyses permitted to recognise the main factors affecting the efficiency of a protective barrier, providing some guidance for a rational design of the intervention.

Efficiency of embedded barriers to mitigate tunnelling effects / Rampello, Sebastiano; Fantera, Laura; Masini, Luca. - In: TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0886-7798. - 89:(2019), pp. 109-124. [10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.027]

Efficiency of embedded barriers to mitigate tunnelling effects

sebastiano rampello
;
Laura Fantera;Luca Masini
2019

Abstract

Ground displacements caused by underground excavations in densely urbanised areas often requires the adoption of protective techniques to prevent damage to existing buildings. When the tunnel passes to the side of a potentially affected building, tunnelling-induced settlements can be reduced pre-installing a protective barrier between the tunnel and the building. Usually, this mitigation technique is implemented in practice based on empirical knowledge rather than as a result of a rational design process. This paper presents a numerical study to evaluate the efficiency of different schemes of embedded barriers, using numerical analyses as a tool to understand the main mechanisms of soil-barrier interaction. Two- and three-dimensional FE analyses were carried out assuming a continuous embedded diaphragm wall or a discontinuous piled wall. The barrier was assumed of either infinite or finite horizontal extension, to evaluate the minimum extension needed to obtain in a given section a settlement reduction similar to that attained under plane strain conditions. The effects induced by wall installation and those associated to the presence of a pre-existing building were also accounted for. The results of the analyses permitted to recognise the main factors affecting the efficiency of a protective barrier, providing some guidance for a rational design of the intervention.
2019
tunnelling; numerical analyses; ground settlements; diaphragm walls; piles; mitigation technique
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Efficiency of embedded barriers to mitigate tunnelling effects / Rampello, Sebastiano; Fantera, Laura; Masini, Luca. - In: TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0886-7798. - 89:(2019), pp. 109-124. [10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.027]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Rampello_Efficiency_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1Yqxi39eM447h8
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 3.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.31 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1257454
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact