Aortic valve stenosis is the most clinically relevant valvular heart disease in the elderlies. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) represented, for decades, the standard of care for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. Although SAVR still represents a valid option in this clinical scenario, transcatheter aortic valve implantation proved to be superior to medical therapy and comparable to SAVR in several randomized trials in patients at high or intermediate operative risk. At the same time, the growing aging population carrying on greater morbidities and high risk profiles has led to the development of minimally invasive technologies, as rapid deployment aortic valve replacement or Sutureless, to minimize surgical impact on patients. The Heart Team is nowadays tasked to determine the best option tailored for each patient considering patient-related factors and mastering all the surgical options in terms of both different techniques and types of available valves. Nevertheless, some open issues need to be already answered as: which has the longest durability, which the lower complication rate and the lower overall mortality. The aim of this review is to briefly resume the main features of these different options and explore what kind of open questions these newer-generation prosthetic valves and delivery devices carry.
Bridging aortic valve surgery to 21st century. what can a surgeon do / D��Abramo, Mizar; Ferrante, Luisa; Guerrera, Manuel; Saade, Wael; Greco, Ernesto; Miraldi, Fabio; Marullo, Antonino; Peruzzi, Mariangela; Barretta, Antonio; Proietti, Piero; Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe; Sciarretta, Sebastiano; Frati, Giacomo; Iaccarino, Alessandra. - In: VESSEL PLUS. - ISSN 2574-1209. - 3:(2019), pp. 1-7. [10.20517/2574-1209.2018.41]
Bridging aortic valve surgery to 21st century. what can a surgeon do
D��Abramo, MizarWriting – Original Draft Preparation
;Ferrante, LuisaInvestigation
;Guerrera, ManuelInvestigation
;Saade, WaelInvestigation
;Greco, ErnestoSupervision
;Miraldi, FabioSupervision
;Marullo, AntoninoSupervision
;Peruzzi, MariangelaValidation
;Barretta, AntonioInvestigation
;Proietti, PieroInvestigation
;Biondi-Zoccai, GiuseppeFormal Analysis
;Sciarretta, SebastianoFormal Analysis
;Frati, GiacomoWriting – Review & Editing
;Iaccarino, Alessandra
Writing – Review & Editing
2019
Abstract
Aortic valve stenosis is the most clinically relevant valvular heart disease in the elderlies. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) represented, for decades, the standard of care for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. Although SAVR still represents a valid option in this clinical scenario, transcatheter aortic valve implantation proved to be superior to medical therapy and comparable to SAVR in several randomized trials in patients at high or intermediate operative risk. At the same time, the growing aging population carrying on greater morbidities and high risk profiles has led to the development of minimally invasive technologies, as rapid deployment aortic valve replacement or Sutureless, to minimize surgical impact on patients. The Heart Team is nowadays tasked to determine the best option tailored for each patient considering patient-related factors and mastering all the surgical options in terms of both different techniques and types of available valves. Nevertheless, some open issues need to be already answered as: which has the longest durability, which the lower complication rate and the lower overall mortality. The aim of this review is to briefly resume the main features of these different options and explore what kind of open questions these newer-generation prosthetic valves and delivery devices carry.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
D’Abramo_Bridging_2019.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
313.3 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
313.3 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.