Background: Gastric stenting has become a common place in clinical practice. The aim of our study was to evaluate the factors influencing the clinical outcome in patients who received endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated the clinical course of 87 patients who presented to our attention with malignant GOO. Results: There was neither mortality nor major morbidity after endoscopic stenting. Survival was reduced (average, 2 mo) in patients with an obstruction due to no resectable pancreatic cancer. In patients with primary no resectable pyloric adenocarcinoma, the crude survival was >1 year. Almost half of the patients required a new endoscopy. Food obstruction was common after 6 months from stent placement, limiting the quality of life of the patients. Conclusions: Endoscopic stenting represents a valid treatment in patients with symptoms of GOO from metastatic cancer. Patients with metastatic pyloric adenocarcinoma and normal liver function tests have survival rates longer than 1 year. In this selected group of patients, laparoscopic surgical gastrojejunostomy can be a valid alternative to avoid a close and exhausting follow-up, with the possibility of a better quality of life (res Registry 808).

Complications after endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. A cohort study / Sterpetti, Antonio V.; Fiori, Enrico; Sapienza, Paolo; Lamazza, Antonietta. - In: SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES. - ISSN 1530-4515. - 29:3(2019), pp. 169-172. [10.1097/SLE.0000000000000656]

Complications after endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. A cohort study

Sterpetti, Antonio V.;Fiori, Enrico;Sapienza, Paolo;Lamazza, Antonietta
2019

Abstract

Background: Gastric stenting has become a common place in clinical practice. The aim of our study was to evaluate the factors influencing the clinical outcome in patients who received endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated the clinical course of 87 patients who presented to our attention with malignant GOO. Results: There was neither mortality nor major morbidity after endoscopic stenting. Survival was reduced (average, 2 mo) in patients with an obstruction due to no resectable pancreatic cancer. In patients with primary no resectable pyloric adenocarcinoma, the crude survival was >1 year. Almost half of the patients required a new endoscopy. Food obstruction was common after 6 months from stent placement, limiting the quality of life of the patients. Conclusions: Endoscopic stenting represents a valid treatment in patients with symptoms of GOO from metastatic cancer. Patients with metastatic pyloric adenocarcinoma and normal liver function tests have survival rates longer than 1 year. In this selected group of patients, laparoscopic surgical gastrojejunostomy can be a valid alternative to avoid a close and exhausting follow-up, with the possibility of a better quality of life (res Registry 808).
2019
complications of gastric stenting; endoscopic stenting; gastric cancer; gastric outlet obstruction syndrome; palliative management of gastric cancer; Surgery
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Complications after endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. A cohort study / Sterpetti, Antonio V.; Fiori, Enrico; Sapienza, Paolo; Lamazza, Antonietta. - In: SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES. - ISSN 1530-4515. - 29:3(2019), pp. 169-172. [10.1097/SLE.0000000000000656]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Sterpetti_Gastric-outlet-obstruction_2019 .pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 258.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
258.9 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1250669
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact