The DPLL (Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland) algorithm is one of the best-known algorithms for solving the problem of satisfiability of propositional formulas. Its efficiency is affected by the way:literals to branch on are chosen. In this paper we analyze the Complexity of the problem of choosing an optimal literal. Namely, we prove that this problem is both NP-hard and coNP-hard, and is in PSPACE. We also study its approximability. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

On the complexity of choosing the branching literal in DPLL / Liberatore, Paolo. - In: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. - ISSN 0004-3702. - STAMPA. - 116:1-2(2000), pp. 315-326. [10.1016/s0004-3702(99)00097-1]

On the complexity of choosing the branching literal in DPLL

LIBERATORE, Paolo
2000

Abstract

The DPLL (Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland) algorithm is one of the best-known algorithms for solving the problem of satisfiability of propositional formulas. Its efficiency is affected by the way:literals to branch on are chosen. In this paper we analyze the Complexity of the problem of choosing an optimal literal. Namely, we prove that this problem is both NP-hard and coNP-hard, and is in PSPACE. We also study its approximability. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
2000
automated reasoning; complexity; computational complexity; davis-putnam; propositional satisfiability
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
On the complexity of choosing the branching literal in DPLL / Liberatore, Paolo. - In: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. - ISSN 0004-3702. - STAMPA. - 116:1-2(2000), pp. 315-326. [10.1016/s0004-3702(99)00097-1]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/124752
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact