This paper aims at investigating the crucial role played by Benedetto Croce’s philosophy in Tullio De Mauro’s early linguistic thought. As a matter of fact, De Mauro has often expressed his own debt towards Croce’s “general linguistics”, that is his Aesthetics and Philosophy of language. During the Fifties of the last century, De Mauro proposed a new interpretation of Croce’s linguistic inquiries, pointing out a clear-cut fracture between the “first” and the “second” Croce, between the systematic and the rhapsodic writings of the great Italian philosopher. According to De Mauro’s own lecture, the so-called “second” Croce offered a new perspective concerning historical languages as practical institutions and opened a more operative dialogue with the linguists. When De Mauro edited and commented Saussure’s Cours (1967), thanks to his “Crocianism”, he created a fruitful synthesis between the individualist and the collective position in relation to the Saussurean theory. The Neo-Idealist legacy allowed Tullio De Mauro to acquire a very original idea of historical and synchronic semantics, which he outlined in one of his masterpieces, namely the Minisemantica (1982).

Tullio De Mauro "paleo-crociano" / Mancini, Marco. - In: INCONTRI LINGUISTICI. - ISSN 0390-2412. - 41:(2018), pp. 41-76.

Tullio De Mauro "paleo-crociano"

Marco Mancini
2018

Abstract

This paper aims at investigating the crucial role played by Benedetto Croce’s philosophy in Tullio De Mauro’s early linguistic thought. As a matter of fact, De Mauro has often expressed his own debt towards Croce’s “general linguistics”, that is his Aesthetics and Philosophy of language. During the Fifties of the last century, De Mauro proposed a new interpretation of Croce’s linguistic inquiries, pointing out a clear-cut fracture between the “first” and the “second” Croce, between the systematic and the rhapsodic writings of the great Italian philosopher. According to De Mauro’s own lecture, the so-called “second” Croce offered a new perspective concerning historical languages as practical institutions and opened a more operative dialogue with the linguists. When De Mauro edited and commented Saussure’s Cours (1967), thanks to his “Crocianism”, he created a fruitful synthesis between the individualist and the collective position in relation to the Saussurean theory. The Neo-Idealist legacy allowed Tullio De Mauro to acquire a very original idea of historical and synchronic semantics, which he outlined in one of his masterpieces, namely the Minisemantica (1982).
2018
De Mauro; Croce; History of Linguistics Structuralism
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Tullio De Mauro "paleo-crociano" / Mancini, Marco. - In: INCONTRI LINGUISTICI. - ISSN 0390-2412. - 41:(2018), pp. 41-76.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Mancini_De-Mauro_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 553.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
553.5 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1247336
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact