The representation, analysis and interpretation of elements of archaeological heritage is a painstaking activity. It also includes a wide range of interdisciplinary subjects and competencies. The interrelation between different disciplines opens up the possibility to achieve complete results as far as documentation, analysis and interpretation of the Archaeological Architecture (AA) are concerned. On one hand, the archaeologist can use explorable and measurable 2D and 3D high precision models, which realistically show surface qualities; on the other hand, architects can turn to their advantage archaeologists’ extensive knowledge of correctly interpreting data in their historical and metric framework and to verify interpretative hypotheses. The proposed paper, starting with the integrated survey of archaeological structures of high historical and artistic importance, like the Colosseum, Pantheon and Arch of Janus in Rome, analyses the possibilities offered by the survey and the representation of Archaeological Architecture at different scales.

The Role of Representation in Archaeological Architecture / Ippolito, Alfonso; Docci, Mario; Inglese, Carlo. - (2018), pp. 399-408. (Intervento presentato al convegno CAA 2016: Oceans of Data: Proceedings of the 44th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology tenutosi a Oslo, Norway).

The Role of Representation in Archaeological Architecture

Alfonso Ippolito
;
Mario Docci
;
Carlo Inglese
2018

Abstract

The representation, analysis and interpretation of elements of archaeological heritage is a painstaking activity. It also includes a wide range of interdisciplinary subjects and competencies. The interrelation between different disciplines opens up the possibility to achieve complete results as far as documentation, analysis and interpretation of the Archaeological Architecture (AA) are concerned. On one hand, the archaeologist can use explorable and measurable 2D and 3D high precision models, which realistically show surface qualities; on the other hand, architects can turn to their advantage archaeologists’ extensive knowledge of correctly interpreting data in their historical and metric framework and to verify interpretative hypotheses. The proposed paper, starting with the integrated survey of archaeological structures of high historical and artistic importance, like the Colosseum, Pantheon and Arch of Janus in Rome, analyses the possibilities offered by the survey and the representation of Archaeological Architecture at different scales.
2018
CAA 2016: Oceans of Data: Proceedings of the 44th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology
archaeological architecture survey; representation; 3D/2D model
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
The Role of Representation in Archaeological Architecture / Ippolito, Alfonso; Docci, Mario; Inglese, Carlo. - (2018), pp. 399-408. (Intervento presentato al convegno CAA 2016: Oceans of Data: Proceedings of the 44th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology tenutosi a Oslo, Norway).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Ippolito_Role-representation-archaeological_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 6.1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.1 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1232532
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact