Choice of calcineurin inhibitor may be a contributing factor to deteriorating patient and graft survival following liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV). In our multicenter, open-label LIS2T study, de novo liver transplant patients stratified by HCV status were randomized to cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Follow-up data were obtained in an observational study of 95 patients. Mean follow-up was 34 and 37 months, respectively, for cyclosporine-treated (n 47) and tacrolimus-treated (n 48) patients. In patients not receiving antiviral therapy, 22 of 31 given cyclosporine (72%) and 24 of 29 given tacrolimus (83%) had biochemical recurrence of HCV. In 68 patients with at least one biopsy, histological evidence of HCV-related hepatitis was present in 27 of 31 (87%) cyclosporinetreated patients and 37 of 37 (100%) tacrolimus-treated patients (P .02, chi-square test). Three-year actuarial risk of fibrosis stage 2 was 66% with cyclosporine and 90% with tacrolimus; for fibrosis stage 3 or 4 it was 46% and 80%, respectively. Three graft losses were attributed to HCV recurrence in cyclosporine-treated patients and six in tacrolimustreated patients. Tacrolimus may be associated with increased risk of histological HCV disease recurrence compared to cyclosporine.

Long-term outcomes in liver transplant patients with hepatic C infection receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine / F., Villamil; G., Levy; G. L., Grazi; S., Mies; D., Samuel; F., Sanjuan; Rossi, Massimo; J., Lake; S., Munn; F., Muhlbacher; L., Leonardi; U., Cillo. - In: TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS. - ISSN 0041-1345. - STAMPA. - 38:9(2006), pp. 2964-2967. [10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.08.131]

Long-term outcomes in liver transplant patients with hepatic C infection receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine

ROSSI, MASSIMO;
2006

Abstract

Choice of calcineurin inhibitor may be a contributing factor to deteriorating patient and graft survival following liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV). In our multicenter, open-label LIS2T study, de novo liver transplant patients stratified by HCV status were randomized to cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Follow-up data were obtained in an observational study of 95 patients. Mean follow-up was 34 and 37 months, respectively, for cyclosporine-treated (n 47) and tacrolimus-treated (n 48) patients. In patients not receiving antiviral therapy, 22 of 31 given cyclosporine (72%) and 24 of 29 given tacrolimus (83%) had biochemical recurrence of HCV. In 68 patients with at least one biopsy, histological evidence of HCV-related hepatitis was present in 27 of 31 (87%) cyclosporinetreated patients and 37 of 37 (100%) tacrolimus-treated patients (P .02, chi-square test). Three-year actuarial risk of fibrosis stage 2 was 66% with cyclosporine and 90% with tacrolimus; for fibrosis stage 3 or 4 it was 46% and 80%, respectively. Three graft losses were attributed to HCV recurrence in cyclosporine-treated patients and six in tacrolimustreated patients. Tacrolimus may be associated with increased risk of histological HCV disease recurrence compared to cyclosporine.
2006
hepatitis c virus infection; liver transplantation; tacrolimus
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Long-term outcomes in liver transplant patients with hepatic C infection receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine / F., Villamil; G., Levy; G. L., Grazi; S., Mies; D., Samuel; F., Sanjuan; Rossi, Massimo; J., Lake; S., Munn; F., Muhlbacher; L., Leonardi; U., Cillo. - In: TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS. - ISSN 0041-1345. - STAMPA. - 38:9(2006), pp. 2964-2967. [10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.08.131]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/122494
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact