BACKGROUND: Due to improvements in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, the healthcare system faces a growing number of cancer survivors. Breast cancer survivors experience many difficulties when returning to work, including discrimination at work and lack of support by employers and colleagues. OBJECTIVE: To point out the knowledge in literature up to date about return to work (RTW) after breast cancer, the factors influencing it and the interventions to facilitate it. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in January 2017 using the databases Medline (PubMed) and Scopus. Studies were included if they analyzed the problem of RTW in women treated for breast cancer. RESULTS: Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies were divided into four themes: factors facilitating or impeding RTW; interventions to enhance RTW; lived experiences of RTW; economic aspects related to cancer survivors and RTW. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneity of the interventions suggests the need for a better definition of the concept of RTW. To compare interventions, studies should use a rigorous approach and better outcome measures should be identified to evaluate RTW.

Returning to work after breast cancer. A systematic review of reviews / Cocchiara, R A; Sciarra, I; D'Egidio, V; Sestili, C; Mancino, M; Backhaus, I; Mannocci, A; De Luca, A; Frusone, F; Di Bella, O; Di Murro, F; Palmeri, V; Lia, L; Paradiso, G; Aceti, V; Libia, A; Monti, M; La Torre, G. - In: WORK. - ISSN 1051-9815. - 61:3(2018), pp. 463-476. [10.3233/WOR-182810]

Returning to work after breast cancer. A systematic review of reviews

Cocchiara, R A;Sciarra, I;D'Egidio, V;Sestili, C;Mancino, M;Backhaus, I;Mannocci, A;De Luca, A;Frusone, F;Di Bella, O;Di Murro, F;Palmeri, V;Lia, L;Paradiso, G;Aceti, V;Libia, A;Monti, M;La Torre, G
2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to improvements in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, the healthcare system faces a growing number of cancer survivors. Breast cancer survivors experience many difficulties when returning to work, including discrimination at work and lack of support by employers and colleagues. OBJECTIVE: To point out the knowledge in literature up to date about return to work (RTW) after breast cancer, the factors influencing it and the interventions to facilitate it. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in January 2017 using the databases Medline (PubMed) and Scopus. Studies were included if they analyzed the problem of RTW in women treated for breast cancer. RESULTS: Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies were divided into four themes: factors facilitating or impeding RTW; interventions to enhance RTW; lived experiences of RTW; economic aspects related to cancer survivors and RTW. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneity of the interventions suggests the need for a better definition of the concept of RTW. To compare interventions, studies should use a rigorous approach and better outcome measures should be identified to evaluate RTW.
2018
occupational medicine; breast cancer; rehabilitation; tertiary prevention
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
Returning to work after breast cancer. A systematic review of reviews / Cocchiara, R A; Sciarra, I; D'Egidio, V; Sestili, C; Mancino, M; Backhaus, I; Mannocci, A; De Luca, A; Frusone, F; Di Bella, O; Di Murro, F; Palmeri, V; Lia, L; Paradiso, G; Aceti, V; Libia, A; Monti, M; La Torre, G. - In: WORK. - ISSN 1051-9815. - 61:3(2018), pp. 463-476. [10.3233/WOR-182810]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cocchiara_Returning_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 157.75 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
157.75 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1213205
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 30
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 53
social impact