We compared 2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET-CT and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in 62 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), aiming to provide evidences that may spare CECT from the staging procedures of HL patients. Among a total of 1448 nodal sites examined, disease involvement was detected in 232 (16%) and 280 (19.3%) nodal areas by CECT and PET-CT, respectively (P < 0.01). Sensitivity of CECT in detecting disease involvement ranged from 0% for internal mammary region (7 cases) and Waldayer's ring (1 case) to 100% for mediastinum. A total of 248 extranodal areas were examined. CECT and PET-CT identified disease involvement in 19 (7.7%) and 25 (10.1%) extranodal areas, respectively (P = n.s). Compared to PET-CT, CECT detected a lower number of cases with bone and/or bone marrow involvement (P = 0.05), whereas no differences were detected at the level of lung. By contrast, CECT identified liver lesions in four patients versus three identified by PET-CT. In comparison to CECT, PET-CT upstaged 6 patients (9.7%) and downstaged 1 patient (1.6%). We showed that PET-CT modified treatment strategy in five (8.1%) cases not only as a result of stage advancement (2 cases) but also of a different prognostic stratification in patients with localized disease (3 cases), due to the better sensitivity in detecting nodal involvement. In conclusion, our data, confirm the superiority of PET-CT in detecting disease involvement at diagnosis of HL, and further supports the possibility to replace CECT with PET-CT in the initial staging of HL.
Comparison of 18F FDG PET-CT AND CECT in pretreatment staging of adults with Hodgkin's lymphoma / Panebianco, Martina; Bagni, Oreste; Cenfra, Natalia; Mecarocci, Sergio; Ortu La Barbera, Elettra; Filippi, Luca; Codacci-Pisanelli, Giovanni; Biondi, Tommaso; Laghi, Andrea; Cimino, Giuseppe. - In: LEUKEMIA RESEARCH. - ISSN 0145-2126. - 76:(2019), pp. 48-52. [10.1016/j.leukres.2018.11.018]
Comparison of 18F FDG PET-CT AND CECT in pretreatment staging of adults with Hodgkin's lymphoma
PANEBIANCO, MARTINAPrimo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Cenfra, Natalia;Mecarocci, SergioMethodology
;Codacci-Pisanelli, GiovanniWriting – Original Draft Preparation
;Biondi, TommasoWriting – Review & Editing
;Laghi, AndreaWriting – Original Draft Preparation
;Cimino, Giuseppe
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2019
Abstract
We compared 2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET-CT and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in 62 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), aiming to provide evidences that may spare CECT from the staging procedures of HL patients. Among a total of 1448 nodal sites examined, disease involvement was detected in 232 (16%) and 280 (19.3%) nodal areas by CECT and PET-CT, respectively (P < 0.01). Sensitivity of CECT in detecting disease involvement ranged from 0% for internal mammary region (7 cases) and Waldayer's ring (1 case) to 100% for mediastinum. A total of 248 extranodal areas were examined. CECT and PET-CT identified disease involvement in 19 (7.7%) and 25 (10.1%) extranodal areas, respectively (P = n.s). Compared to PET-CT, CECT detected a lower number of cases with bone and/or bone marrow involvement (P = 0.05), whereas no differences were detected at the level of lung. By contrast, CECT identified liver lesions in four patients versus three identified by PET-CT. In comparison to CECT, PET-CT upstaged 6 patients (9.7%) and downstaged 1 patient (1.6%). We showed that PET-CT modified treatment strategy in five (8.1%) cases not only as a result of stage advancement (2 cases) but also of a different prognostic stratification in patients with localized disease (3 cases), due to the better sensitivity in detecting nodal involvement. In conclusion, our data, confirm the superiority of PET-CT in detecting disease involvement at diagnosis of HL, and further supports the possibility to replace CECT with PET-CT in the initial staging of HL.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Panebianco_Comparison_2019.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
576.86 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
576.86 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.