Objective: We evaluated the short-and long-term results of off-label use of iliac branch devices (IBDs) in isolated common iliac artery aneurysms compared with the manufacturer-recommended configuration with additional extension in the infrarenal aorta based on the pELVIS Registry (pErformance of iLiac branch deVIces for aneurysmS involving the iliac bifurcation).Methods: Between January 2005 and April 2017, 804 patients underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with 910 IBDs owingto aneurysmal involvement of the iliac bifurcationinnine high-volumeEuropeanvascular centers. Amongthis cohort, 231 IBDs were implanted in 207 patients to treat an isolated common iliac aneurysm; 91 IBDs (group 1) were implanted without proximal aortic extension in the infrarenal aorta, and in the remaining cases (n = 140; group 2) an aortic bifurcated stent graft was deployed proximally as stated in the instructions for use. Primary outcomes were IBD and target hypogastric artery occlusions, type I and III endoleaks, procedure-related reinterventions, and aneurysm-related deaths.Results: Technical success was achieved in 90 cases (98.9%) in group 1 versus 137 cases (97.8%) in group 2 (P=.55). The overall aneurysm-related early reintervention rate for the two groups was 4.4% (4 of 91) and 2.1% (3 of 140), respectively (P=.33). The 30-day mortality was 1.1% in group 1 (n = 1), and 0% in group 2 (P=.21). The median postoperative follow-up in groups 1 and 2 were 34.1 months (range, 1-108 months) and 17.5 months (range, 1-90 months), respectively. The estimated rates of freedom from IBD occlusion at 60 months were 86% in group 1 and 83% in group 2 (P=.69). The estimated rates of freedom from target hypogastric artery occlusion at 60 months were 98.3% in group 1 and 91.3% in group 2 (P=.45). The estimated freedom from reintervention rates at 60 months for types I, types III, and IBD stenosis-occlusion were 78.2% in group 1 and 79.9% in group 2 (P=.79). The estimated freedom from all cause reintervention at 60 months was 64.5% in group 1 and 66.1% in group 2 (P=.44). The estimated freedom from aneurysm-related death at 60 months was 97.9% in group 1 and 100% in group 2 (P=.83).Conclusions: Single IBD placement for isolated common iliac artery aneurysms seems to be a safe and effective treatment option, when a proper anatomic patient selection is provided. Major benefits are represented by the decrease in X ray exposure, overall procedural time, and use of contrast medium, without affecting perioperative and long-term results in comparison with more extensive procedures.

Results of the multicenter pELVIS Registry for isolated common iliac aneurysms treated by the iliac branch device / Fargion, Aaron T; Masciello, Fabrizio; Pratesi, CARLO ALBERTO; Pratesi, Giovanni; Torsello, Giovanni; Donas, Konstantinos P; Ferrer, Ciro. - In: JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY. - ISSN 0741-5214. - 68:5(2018), pp. 1367-1373.e1-1373.e1. [10.1016/j.jvs.2018.02.032]

Results of the multicenter pELVIS Registry for isolated common iliac aneurysms treated by the iliac branch device

PRATESI, CARLO ALBERTO;Ferrer, Ciro
2018

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the short-and long-term results of off-label use of iliac branch devices (IBDs) in isolated common iliac artery aneurysms compared with the manufacturer-recommended configuration with additional extension in the infrarenal aorta based on the pELVIS Registry (pErformance of iLiac branch deVIces for aneurysmS involving the iliac bifurcation).Methods: Between January 2005 and April 2017, 804 patients underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with 910 IBDs owingto aneurysmal involvement of the iliac bifurcationinnine high-volumeEuropeanvascular centers. Amongthis cohort, 231 IBDs were implanted in 207 patients to treat an isolated common iliac aneurysm; 91 IBDs (group 1) were implanted without proximal aortic extension in the infrarenal aorta, and in the remaining cases (n = 140; group 2) an aortic bifurcated stent graft was deployed proximally as stated in the instructions for use. Primary outcomes were IBD and target hypogastric artery occlusions, type I and III endoleaks, procedure-related reinterventions, and aneurysm-related deaths.Results: Technical success was achieved in 90 cases (98.9%) in group 1 versus 137 cases (97.8%) in group 2 (P=.55). The overall aneurysm-related early reintervention rate for the two groups was 4.4% (4 of 91) and 2.1% (3 of 140), respectively (P=.33). The 30-day mortality was 1.1% in group 1 (n = 1), and 0% in group 2 (P=.21). The median postoperative follow-up in groups 1 and 2 were 34.1 months (range, 1-108 months) and 17.5 months (range, 1-90 months), respectively. The estimated rates of freedom from IBD occlusion at 60 months were 86% in group 1 and 83% in group 2 (P=.69). The estimated rates of freedom from target hypogastric artery occlusion at 60 months were 98.3% in group 1 and 91.3% in group 2 (P=.45). The estimated freedom from reintervention rates at 60 months for types I, types III, and IBD stenosis-occlusion were 78.2% in group 1 and 79.9% in group 2 (P=.79). The estimated freedom from all cause reintervention at 60 months was 64.5% in group 1 and 66.1% in group 2 (P=.44). The estimated freedom from aneurysm-related death at 60 months was 97.9% in group 1 and 100% in group 2 (P=.83).Conclusions: Single IBD placement for isolated common iliac artery aneurysms seems to be a safe and effective treatment option, when a proper anatomic patient selection is provided. Major benefits are represented by the decrease in X ray exposure, overall procedural time, and use of contrast medium, without affecting perioperative and long-term results in comparison with more extensive procedures.
2018
Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair; Endovascular iliac aneurysm repair; Iliac branch devices; Occlusion; Reintervention
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Results of the multicenter pELVIS Registry for isolated common iliac aneurysms treated by the iliac branch device / Fargion, Aaron T; Masciello, Fabrizio; Pratesi, CARLO ALBERTO; Pratesi, Giovanni; Torsello, Giovanni; Donas, Konstantinos P; Ferrer, Ciro. - In: JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY. - ISSN 0741-5214. - 68:5(2018), pp. 1367-1373.e1-1373.e1. [10.1016/j.jvs.2018.02.032]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1210893
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact