Eruptions of Sinabung volcano, Indonesia have been ongoing since 2013. Since that time, the character of eruptions has changed, from phreatic to phreatomagmatic to magmatic explosive eruptions, and from production of a lava dome that collapsed to a subsequent thick lava flow that slowly ceased to be active, and later, to a new lava dome. As the eruption progressed, event trees were constructed to forecast eruptive behavior six times, with forecast windows that ranged from 2. weeks to 1. year: November 7-10, December 12-14, and December 27, 2013; and January 9-10, May 13, and October 7, 2014. These event trees were successful in helping to frame the forecast scenarios, to collate current monitoring information, and to document outstanding questions and unknowns. The highest probability forecasts closely matched outcomes of eruption size (including extrusion of the first dome), production of pyroclastic density currents, and pyroclastic density current runout distances. Events assigned low probabilities also occurred, including total collapse of the lava dome in January 2014 and production of a small blast pyroclastic density current in February 2014.

Construction of probabilistic event trees for eruption forecasting at Sinabung volcano, Indonesia 2013-14 / Wright, Heather M. N.; Pallister, John S.; Mccausland, Wendy A.; Griswold, Julia P.; Andreastuti, Supriyati; Budianto, Agus; Primulyana, Sofyan; Gunawan, Hendra; VDAP team, 2013; event tree team, Cvghm; Battaglia, Maurizio. - In: JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0377-0273. - 382:(2019), pp. 233-252. [10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.02.003]

Construction of probabilistic event trees for eruption forecasting at Sinabung volcano, Indonesia 2013-14

Maurizio Battaglia
Membro del Collaboration Group
2019

Abstract

Eruptions of Sinabung volcano, Indonesia have been ongoing since 2013. Since that time, the character of eruptions has changed, from phreatic to phreatomagmatic to magmatic explosive eruptions, and from production of a lava dome that collapsed to a subsequent thick lava flow that slowly ceased to be active, and later, to a new lava dome. As the eruption progressed, event trees were constructed to forecast eruptive behavior six times, with forecast windows that ranged from 2. weeks to 1. year: November 7-10, December 12-14, and December 27, 2013; and January 9-10, May 13, and October 7, 2014. These event trees were successful in helping to frame the forecast scenarios, to collate current monitoring information, and to document outstanding questions and unknowns. The highest probability forecasts closely matched outcomes of eruption size (including extrusion of the first dome), production of pyroclastic density currents, and pyroclastic density current runout distances. Events assigned low probabilities also occurred, including total collapse of the lava dome in January 2014 and production of a small blast pyroclastic density current in February 2014.
2019
Andesite volcano; eruption forecast; probabilistic forecast; volcanic dome; volcano hazards; geophysics; geochemistry and petrology
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Construction of probabilistic event trees for eruption forecasting at Sinabung volcano, Indonesia 2013-14 / Wright, Heather M. N.; Pallister, John S.; Mccausland, Wendy A.; Griswold, Julia P.; Andreastuti, Supriyati; Budianto, Agus; Primulyana, Sofyan; Gunawan, Hendra; VDAP team, 2013; event tree team, Cvghm; Battaglia, Maurizio. - In: JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0377-0273. - 382:(2019), pp. 233-252. [10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.02.003]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Wright_Construction_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 6.99 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.99 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1209002
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact