Pancreatic cancer is the 4th cancer-related cause of death in Western countries and it is expected to become the 2nd leading cause of death by 2030. Approximately 80% of patients are unresectable at diagnosis including a 41.4% of patients found unresectable at exploratory laparoscopy/tomy. The reasons for such unresectability stand in undiagnosed metastatic burden but most of all in locally advanced disease beyond limits of surgical treatment. Those limits are however related to the surgeon expertise and experience. Venous resection has been demonstrated as safely feasible in order to achieve clear surgical margins but the discussion about arterial resections is still ongoing. Even though it had been banned for its high surgical risks, recent evidences claim it to give a survival advantage in selected patients. The widespread use of neoadjuvant treatments makes preoperative imaging unreliable in predicting residual vascular invasion. The majority of vascular resections are indeed unplanned. Up to 38% of eventually resected patients need a vascular resection in order to achieve a radical pancreatectomy, just over half of which because of a histological invasion. This is a state of the art of the results of vascular resection in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Role of Vascular Resection in the Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer / Antolino, Laura; D'Angelo, Francesco; Aurello, Paolo; Valabrega, Stefano; Petrucciani, Niccolo'; Nigri, Giuseppe; Ramacciato, Giovanni. - (2018), p. 122. (Intervento presentato al convegno BIT's 3rd Annual World Congress of Digestive Disease-2018 tenutosi a Roma).

Role of Vascular Resection in the Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

Laura Antolino;Francesco D’Angelo;Paolo Aurello;Stefano Valabrega;Niccolò Petrucciani;Giuseppe Nigri;Giovanni Ramacciato
2018

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is the 4th cancer-related cause of death in Western countries and it is expected to become the 2nd leading cause of death by 2030. Approximately 80% of patients are unresectable at diagnosis including a 41.4% of patients found unresectable at exploratory laparoscopy/tomy. The reasons for such unresectability stand in undiagnosed metastatic burden but most of all in locally advanced disease beyond limits of surgical treatment. Those limits are however related to the surgeon expertise and experience. Venous resection has been demonstrated as safely feasible in order to achieve clear surgical margins but the discussion about arterial resections is still ongoing. Even though it had been banned for its high surgical risks, recent evidences claim it to give a survival advantage in selected patients. The widespread use of neoadjuvant treatments makes preoperative imaging unreliable in predicting residual vascular invasion. The majority of vascular resections are indeed unplanned. Up to 38% of eventually resected patients need a vascular resection in order to achieve a radical pancreatectomy, just over half of which because of a histological invasion. This is a state of the art of the results of vascular resection in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
2018
BIT's 3rd Annual World Congress of Digestive Disease-2018
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04d Abstract in atti di convegno
Role of Vascular Resection in the Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer / Antolino, Laura; D'Angelo, Francesco; Aurello, Paolo; Valabrega, Stefano; Petrucciani, Niccolo'; Nigri, Giuseppe; Ramacciato, Giovanni. - (2018), p. 122. (Intervento presentato al convegno BIT's 3rd Annual World Congress of Digestive Disease-2018 tenutosi a Roma).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1203262
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact