Objective: To determine which protocols work better between cetrorelix and long protocols in older patients in a randomized controlled study. Design: A controlled randomized study in a single private IVF center. Setting: Infertile women referred to a private IVF center. Patient(s): Five hundred sixty-four women 40 years or older undergoing IVF. Intervention(s): At their first IVF cycle, the women were randomized into two study groups using a computer-generated number sequence: 281 cases were treated with the cetrorelix protocol, and 283 patients were treated with a long protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Main Outcome Measure(s): Days of stimulation, E2 on the day of hCG administration, amount of FSH administered, number of oocytes yielded, number of embryos obtained, pregnancy rate, and implantation rate. Result(s): Patients treated with the long protocol showed a significantly higher number of oocytes retrieved and a higher pregnancy rate for both the cycle and transfer with respect to the cetrorelix protocol patients. The other parameter evaluated did not show any statistically significant differences. Conclusion(s): Our study showed that the long protocol performed better in older women than the cetrorelix protocol and that the GnRH antagonist may be detrimental in older women. © 2009 American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Cetrorelix protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog suppression long protocol for superovulation in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients older than 40 / Marco, Sbracia; Julio, Colabianchi; Annalise, Giallonardo; Pierluigi, Giannini; Claudio, Piscitelli; Francesco, Morgia; Montignanim, ; Schimberni, Mauro. - In: FERTILITY AND STERILITY. - ISSN 0015-0282. - 91:5(2009), pp. 1842-1847. [10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.165]

Cetrorelix protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog suppression long protocol for superovulation in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients older than 40.

SCHIMBERNI, Mauro
2009

Abstract

Objective: To determine which protocols work better between cetrorelix and long protocols in older patients in a randomized controlled study. Design: A controlled randomized study in a single private IVF center. Setting: Infertile women referred to a private IVF center. Patient(s): Five hundred sixty-four women 40 years or older undergoing IVF. Intervention(s): At their first IVF cycle, the women were randomized into two study groups using a computer-generated number sequence: 281 cases were treated with the cetrorelix protocol, and 283 patients were treated with a long protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Main Outcome Measure(s): Days of stimulation, E2 on the day of hCG administration, amount of FSH administered, number of oocytes yielded, number of embryos obtained, pregnancy rate, and implantation rate. Result(s): Patients treated with the long protocol showed a significantly higher number of oocytes retrieved and a higher pregnancy rate for both the cycle and transfer with respect to the cetrorelix protocol patients. The other parameter evaluated did not show any statistically significant differences. Conclusion(s): Our study showed that the long protocol performed better in older women than the cetrorelix protocol and that the GnRH antagonist may be detrimental in older women. © 2009 American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
2009
cetrorelix; ivf outcome; gnrh analog; gnrh antagonist; controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; long protocol
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Cetrorelix protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog suppression long protocol for superovulation in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients older than 40 / Marco, Sbracia; Julio, Colabianchi; Annalise, Giallonardo; Pierluigi, Giannini; Claudio, Piscitelli; Francesco, Morgia; Montignanim, ; Schimberni, Mauro. - In: FERTILITY AND STERILITY. - ISSN 0015-0282. - 91:5(2009), pp. 1842-1847. [10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.165]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/120102
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact