Recently, the new American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) rules and the old Rechtschaffen and Kales (R&K) criteria for sleep scoring have been shown to produce significantly different results in adults. The aim of this study was to describe in detail such differences in a group of normal children. Polysomnographic recordings from 45 healthy children (18 females and 27 males) aged between 3 and 16 years were scored following both systems and the results compared. Several significant differences between the two scoring systems were found: N1 (AASM) was significantly higher than S1 (R&K) while Stages N2 and R (AASM) were significantly smaller than S2 and rapid eye movement (R&K). The Kendall Tau correlation coefficient revealed a relatively low concordance between the two systems for the scoring of number of stage shifts per hour, minutes and percentage of Stage N1/S1, and of a percentage of Stage S2/N2. The significant differences between R&K and AASM scoring systems suggest taking some caution in adopting the new scoring criteria in children; these might be shown to be potentially useful if careful selection of the appropriate indicators derived from this new method is carried out, such as the percentage of N1 and the number of stage shifts, which are measures very sensitive to the occurrence of arousals in the new AASM system.

Sleep classification according to AASM and Rechtschaffen and Kales: effects on sleep scoring parameters of children and adolescents / Luana, Novelli; Raffaele, Ferri; Bruni, Oliviero. - In: JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH. - ISSN 0962-1105. - 19:1 PART. 2(2010), pp. 238-247. [10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00785.x]

Sleep classification according to AASM and Rechtschaffen and Kales: effects on sleep scoring parameters of children and adolescents

BRUNI, Oliviero
2010

Abstract

Recently, the new American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) rules and the old Rechtschaffen and Kales (R&K) criteria for sleep scoring have been shown to produce significantly different results in adults. The aim of this study was to describe in detail such differences in a group of normal children. Polysomnographic recordings from 45 healthy children (18 females and 27 males) aged between 3 and 16 years were scored following both systems and the results compared. Several significant differences between the two scoring systems were found: N1 (AASM) was significantly higher than S1 (R&K) while Stages N2 and R (AASM) were significantly smaller than S2 and rapid eye movement (R&K). The Kendall Tau correlation coefficient revealed a relatively low concordance between the two systems for the scoring of number of stage shifts per hour, minutes and percentage of Stage N1/S1, and of a percentage of Stage S2/N2. The significant differences between R&K and AASM scoring systems suggest taking some caution in adopting the new scoring criteria in children; these might be shown to be potentially useful if careful selection of the appropriate indicators derived from this new method is carried out, such as the percentage of N1 and the number of stage shifts, which are measures very sensitive to the occurrence of arousals in the new AASM system.
2010
rechtschaffen and kales; sleep architecture; children; american academy of sleep medicine scoring standard; sleep scoring
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Sleep classification according to AASM and Rechtschaffen and Kales: effects on sleep scoring parameters of children and adolescents / Luana, Novelli; Raffaele, Ferri; Bruni, Oliviero. - In: JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH. - ISSN 0962-1105. - 19:1 PART. 2(2010), pp. 238-247. [10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00785.x]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/119397
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 17
  • Scopus 53
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact