Abstract: This article summarises the information that should be provided to women and referring physicians about breast ultrasound (US). After explaining the physical principles, technical procedure and safety of US, information is given about its ability to make a correct diagnosis, depending on the setting in which it is applied. The following definite indications for breast US in female subjects are proposed: palpable lump; axillary adenopathy; first diagnostic approach for clinical abnormalities under 40 and in pregnant or lactating women; suspicious abnormalities at mammography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); suspicious nipple discharge; recent nipple inversion; skin retraction; breast inflammation; abnormalities in the area of the surgical scar after breast conserving surgery or mastectomy; abnormalities in the presence of breast implants; screening high-risk women, especially when MRI is not performed; loco-regional staging of a known breast cancer, when MRI is not performed; guidance for percutaneous interventions (needle biopsy, pre-surgical localisation, fluid collection drainage); monitoring patients with breast cancer receiving neo-adjuvant therapy, when MRI is not performed. Possible indications such as supplemental screening after mammography for women aged 40–74 with dense breasts are also listed. Moreover, inappropriate indications include screening for breast cancer as a stand-alone alternative to mammography. The structure and organisation of the breast US report and of classification systems such as the BI-RADS and consequent management recommendations are illustrated. Information about additional or new US technologies (colour-Doppler, elastography, and automated whole breast US) is also provided. Finally, five frequently asked questions are answered. Teaching Points: • US is an established tool for suspected cancers at all ages and also the method of choice under 40. • For US-visible suspicious lesions, US-guided biopsy is preferred, even for palpable findings. • High-risk women can be screened with US, especially when MRI cannot be performed. • Supplemental US increases cancer detection but also false positives, biopsy rate and follow-up exams. • Breast US is inappropriate as a stand-alone screening method.

Breast ultrasound: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging / Evans, Andrew; Trimboli, Rubina M.; Athanasiou, Alexandra; Balleyguier, Corinne; Baltzer, Pascal A.; Bick, Ulrich; Camps Herrero, Julia; Clauser, Paola; Colin, Catherine; Cornford, Eleanor; Fallenberg, Eva M.; Fuchsjaeger, Michael H.; Gilbert, Fiona J.; Helbich, Thomas H.; Kinkel, Karen; Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H.; Kuhl, Christiane K.; Mann, Ritse M.; Martincich, Laura; Panizza, Pietro; Pediconi, Federica; Pijnappel, Ruud M.; Pinker, Katja; Zackrisson, Sophia; Forrai, Gabor; Sardanelli, Francesco. - In: INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING. - ISSN 1869-4101. - 9:4(2018), pp. 449-461. [10.1007/s13244-018-0636-z]

Breast ultrasound: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging

Pediconi, Federica;
2018

Abstract

Abstract: This article summarises the information that should be provided to women and referring physicians about breast ultrasound (US). After explaining the physical principles, technical procedure and safety of US, information is given about its ability to make a correct diagnosis, depending on the setting in which it is applied. The following definite indications for breast US in female subjects are proposed: palpable lump; axillary adenopathy; first diagnostic approach for clinical abnormalities under 40 and in pregnant or lactating women; suspicious abnormalities at mammography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); suspicious nipple discharge; recent nipple inversion; skin retraction; breast inflammation; abnormalities in the area of the surgical scar after breast conserving surgery or mastectomy; abnormalities in the presence of breast implants; screening high-risk women, especially when MRI is not performed; loco-regional staging of a known breast cancer, when MRI is not performed; guidance for percutaneous interventions (needle biopsy, pre-surgical localisation, fluid collection drainage); monitoring patients with breast cancer receiving neo-adjuvant therapy, when MRI is not performed. Possible indications such as supplemental screening after mammography for women aged 40–74 with dense breasts are also listed. Moreover, inappropriate indications include screening for breast cancer as a stand-alone alternative to mammography. The structure and organisation of the breast US report and of classification systems such as the BI-RADS and consequent management recommendations are illustrated. Information about additional or new US technologies (colour-Doppler, elastography, and automated whole breast US) is also provided. Finally, five frequently asked questions are answered. Teaching Points: • US is an established tool for suspected cancers at all ages and also the method of choice under 40. • For US-visible suspicious lesions, US-guided biopsy is preferred, even for palpable findings. • High-risk women can be screened with US, especially when MRI cannot be performed. • Supplemental US increases cancer detection but also false positives, biopsy rate and follow-up exams. • Breast US is inappropriate as a stand-alone screening method.
2018
automated whole breast ultrasound; BI-RADS; breast cancer; breast ultrasound (US); colour-doppler; elastography; radiology, nuclear medicine and maging
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Breast ultrasound: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging / Evans, Andrew; Trimboli, Rubina M.; Athanasiou, Alexandra; Balleyguier, Corinne; Baltzer, Pascal A.; Bick, Ulrich; Camps Herrero, Julia; Clauser, Paola; Colin, Catherine; Cornford, Eleanor; Fallenberg, Eva M.; Fuchsjaeger, Michael H.; Gilbert, Fiona J.; Helbich, Thomas H.; Kinkel, Karen; Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H.; Kuhl, Christiane K.; Mann, Ritse M.; Martincich, Laura; Panizza, Pietro; Pediconi, Federica; Pijnappel, Ruud M.; Pinker, Katja; Zackrisson, Sophia; Forrai, Gabor; Sardanelli, Francesco. - In: INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING. - ISSN 1869-4101. - 9:4(2018), pp. 449-461. [10.1007/s13244-018-0636-z]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Evans_Breast_2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://insightsimaging.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s13244-018-0636-z
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 907.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
907.32 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1193966
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 33
  • Scopus 105
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 81
social impact