Abstract The purpose of the current study was to determine whether the level of metacognitive sensitivity previously observed in global Judgments-of-Learning (JOLs) in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients could also be established when making item-by-item JOLs. Fourteen TLE patients and 14 control participants were compared on a memory task where 39 semantically unrelated word pairs were presented at three different levels of repetition. Thirteen word pairs were assigned to each level. A combined JOL and Feeling-of-Knowing (FOK) task was used to examine metamemory monitoring and control processes. The results showed that control participants outperformed TLE patients on recall and recognition. However, both groups were sensitive to repetition of the word pairs throughout the list, revealing intact online monitoring and control processes at encoding. These results are consistent with the findings of Howard et al. (2010) of intact metamemory in TLE patients and extend the findings of Andrés et al. (2010) of metamemory sensitivity from the global level to the item-by-item level. Finally, the current findings provide additional evidence of a dissociation between memory and metamemory in TLE patients. (JINS, 2013, 19, 1-10) Copyright © INS.

Metamemory in temporal lobe epilepsy: A study of sensitivity to repetition at Encoding / Howard, Charlotte E.; Andrés, Pilar; Mazzoni, Giuliana. - In: JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY. - ISSN 1355-6177. - 19:4(2013), pp. 453-462. [10.1017/S1355617712001646]

Metamemory in temporal lobe epilepsy: A study of sensitivity to repetition at Encoding

Mazzoni, Giuliana
2013

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of the current study was to determine whether the level of metacognitive sensitivity previously observed in global Judgments-of-Learning (JOLs) in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients could also be established when making item-by-item JOLs. Fourteen TLE patients and 14 control participants were compared on a memory task where 39 semantically unrelated word pairs were presented at three different levels of repetition. Thirteen word pairs were assigned to each level. A combined JOL and Feeling-of-Knowing (FOK) task was used to examine metamemory monitoring and control processes. The results showed that control participants outperformed TLE patients on recall and recognition. However, both groups were sensitive to repetition of the word pairs throughout the list, revealing intact online monitoring and control processes at encoding. These results are consistent with the findings of Howard et al. (2010) of intact metamemory in TLE patients and extend the findings of Andrés et al. (2010) of metamemory sensitivity from the global level to the item-by-item level. Finally, the current findings provide additional evidence of a dissociation between memory and metamemory in TLE patients. (JINS, 2013, 19, 1-10) Copyright © INS.
2013
Control processes; Feeling-of-knowing; Judgments-of-learning; Metacognition; Monitoring; Recall; Adult; Association Learning; Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe; Female; Humans; Judgment; Male; Memory Disorders; Mental Recall; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Vocabulary; Young Adult; Neuroscience (all); Clinical Psychology; Neurology (clinical); Psychiatry and Mental Health
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Metamemory in temporal lobe epilepsy: A study of sensitivity to repetition at Encoding / Howard, Charlotte E.; Andrés, Pilar; Mazzoni, Giuliana. - In: JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY. - ISSN 1355-6177. - 19:4(2013), pp. 453-462. [10.1017/S1355617712001646]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1190075
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact