"Don't know" (DK) responses to interview questions are conceptually heterogeneous, and may represent uncertainty or clear statements about the contents of memory. A study examined the subjective intent of DK responses in relation to the objective status of information queried, in the context of memory distorting procedures. Participants viewed a video and responded to answerable and unanswerable questions phrased in misleading or nonmisleading formats, while hypnotized or not hypnotized. Subjective meanings of DK responses were queried, and a recognition measure assessed the contents of memory. Lower DK and accuracy rates were consistently associated with unanswerable and misleading questions. One-third of DK responses were statements that the information had no not presented. When these were recoded, accuracy estimates for answerable questions decreased and more so for hypnotized participants. These results demonstrate that DK responses convey different types of information, thus accuracy estimates in studies that permit DK responses may be misestimated. Robust risks associated with asking unanswerable questions and asking questions at all were observed. Implications for working with DK responses during interviews are discussed. © 2008 American Psychological Association.

"Don't Know" Responding to Answerable and Unanswerable Questions During Misleading and Hypnotic Interviews / Scoboria, Alan; Mazzoni, Giuliana; Kirsch, Irving. - In: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY. APPLIED. - ISSN 1076-898X. - 14:3(2008), pp. 255-265. [10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.255]

"Don't Know" Responding to Answerable and Unanswerable Questions During Misleading and Hypnotic Interviews

Mazzoni, Giuliana;
2008

Abstract

"Don't know" (DK) responses to interview questions are conceptually heterogeneous, and may represent uncertainty or clear statements about the contents of memory. A study examined the subjective intent of DK responses in relation to the objective status of information queried, in the context of memory distorting procedures. Participants viewed a video and responded to answerable and unanswerable questions phrased in misleading or nonmisleading formats, while hypnotized or not hypnotized. Subjective meanings of DK responses were queried, and a recognition measure assessed the contents of memory. Lower DK and accuracy rates were consistently associated with unanswerable and misleading questions. One-third of DK responses were statements that the information had no not presented. When these were recoded, accuracy estimates for answerable questions decreased and more so for hypnotized participants. These results demonstrate that DK responses convey different types of information, thus accuracy estimates in studies that permit DK responses may be misestimated. Robust risks associated with asking unanswerable questions and asking questions at all were observed. Implications for working with DK responses during interviews are discussed. © 2008 American Psychological Association.
2008
"don't know" response; hypnosis; interview; memory; misinformation; Adolescent; Adult; Female; Humans; Interview, Psychological; Male; Theft; Video Recording; Culture; Hypnosis; Mental Recall; Suggestion; Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
"Don't Know" Responding to Answerable and Unanswerable Questions During Misleading and Hypnotic Interviews / Scoboria, Alan; Mazzoni, Giuliana; Kirsch, Irving. - In: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY. APPLIED. - ISSN 1076-898X. - 14:3(2008), pp. 255-265. [10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.255]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1188930
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 33
social impact