The assessment of waveform similarity is a crucial issue in gait analysis for the comparison of electromyography (EMG) and kinematic patterns with reference data. A typical scenario is in fact the comparison of a patient’s EMG pattern with a relevant physiological pattern. Many methods have been proposed for a quantitative comparison of the two patterns, suggesting the absence of a gold standard. A recently proposed method for comparing kinematic patterns is the linear fit method (LFM). This study aims at testing the applicability of this method on data of EMG. The validity of LFM was tested in terms of appropriateness, sensitivity, specificity, and reliability, by comparing 20 EMG pathological gait patterns (obtained by a group of patients with Parkinson’s Disease) and 20 EMG physiological gait patterns (obtained by healthy subjects). When gastrocnemious and tibialis anterior EMG activity was analyzed, the appropriateness of LFM in discriminating pathological patterns resulted of 97.5%, with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 100%. The reliability was good for 2 out of 3 parameters in each group of subjects. The LFM resulted a simple method suitable for analysing the waveform similarity in gait EMG clinical analysis.

Assessment of waveform similarity in electromyographical clinical gait data: the linear fit method / Iosa, Marco; Peppe, Antonella; Morone, Giovanni; Bottino, Sonia; Bini, Fabiano; Marinozzi, Franco; Paolucci, Stefano. - In: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING. - ISSN 1609-0985. - 38:5(2018), pp. 774-781. [10.1007/s40846-018-0372-3]

Assessment of waveform similarity in electromyographical clinical gait data: the linear fit method

Iosa, Marco
;
Bini, Fabiano;Marinozzi, Franco;
2018

Abstract

The assessment of waveform similarity is a crucial issue in gait analysis for the comparison of electromyography (EMG) and kinematic patterns with reference data. A typical scenario is in fact the comparison of a patient’s EMG pattern with a relevant physiological pattern. Many methods have been proposed for a quantitative comparison of the two patterns, suggesting the absence of a gold standard. A recently proposed method for comparing kinematic patterns is the linear fit method (LFM). This study aims at testing the applicability of this method on data of EMG. The validity of LFM was tested in terms of appropriateness, sensitivity, specificity, and reliability, by comparing 20 EMG pathological gait patterns (obtained by a group of patients with Parkinson’s Disease) and 20 EMG physiological gait patterns (obtained by healthy subjects). When gastrocnemious and tibialis anterior EMG activity was analyzed, the appropriateness of LFM in discriminating pathological patterns resulted of 97.5%, with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 100%. The reliability was good for 2 out of 3 parameters in each group of subjects. The LFM resulted a simple method suitable for analysing the waveform similarity in gait EMG clinical analysis.
2018
electromyography (emg); gait analysis; muscle activity; parkinson’s disease; rehabilitation; biomedical engineering
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Assessment of waveform similarity in electromyographical clinical gait data: the linear fit method / Iosa, Marco; Peppe, Antonella; Morone, Giovanni; Bottino, Sonia; Bini, Fabiano; Marinozzi, Franco; Paolucci, Stefano. - In: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING. - ISSN 1609-0985. - 38:5(2018), pp. 774-781. [10.1007/s40846-018-0372-3]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Iosa_assessment-of-waveform_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.07 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.07 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1188437
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact