While some studies have shown that providing a cue to selectively forget one subset of previously learned facts may cause specific forgetting of this information, little is known about the mechanisms underlying this memory phenomenon. In three experiments, we aimed to better understand the nature of the selective directed forgetting (SDF) effect. Participants studied a List 1 consisting of 18 sentences regarding two (or three) different characters and a List 2 consisting of sentences regarding an additional character. In Experiment 1, we explored the role of rehearsal as the mechanism producing SDF by examining the effect of articulatory suppression after List 1 and during List 2 presentation. In Experiments 2 and 3, we explored the role of attentional control mechanisms by introducing a concurrent updating task after List 1 and during List 2 (Experiment 2) and by manipulating the number of characters to be selectively forgotten (1 out of 3 vs. 2 out of 3). Results from the three experiments suggest that neither rehearsal nor context change seem to be the mechanisms underlying SDF, while the pattern of results is consistent with an inhibitory account. In addition, whatever the responsible mechanism is, SDF seems to rely on the available attentional resources and the demands of the task. Our results join other findings to show that SDF is a robust phenomenon and suggest boundary conditions for the effect to be observed.

Exploring mechanisms of selective directed forgetting / Aguirre, C; Gómez-Ariza, Cj; Andrés, P; Mazzoni, G; Bajo, Mt. - In: FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 1664-1078. - 8:MAR(2017), pp. 1-15. [10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00316]

Exploring mechanisms of selective directed forgetting

G Mazzoni;
2017

Abstract

While some studies have shown that providing a cue to selectively forget one subset of previously learned facts may cause specific forgetting of this information, little is known about the mechanisms underlying this memory phenomenon. In three experiments, we aimed to better understand the nature of the selective directed forgetting (SDF) effect. Participants studied a List 1 consisting of 18 sentences regarding two (or three) different characters and a List 2 consisting of sentences regarding an additional character. In Experiment 1, we explored the role of rehearsal as the mechanism producing SDF by examining the effect of articulatory suppression after List 1 and during List 2 presentation. In Experiments 2 and 3, we explored the role of attentional control mechanisms by introducing a concurrent updating task after List 1 and during List 2 (Experiment 2) and by manipulating the number of characters to be selectively forgotten (1 out of 3 vs. 2 out of 3). Results from the three experiments suggest that neither rehearsal nor context change seem to be the mechanisms underlying SDF, while the pattern of results is consistent with an inhibitory account. In addition, whatever the responsible mechanism is, SDF seems to rely on the available attentional resources and the demands of the task. Our results join other findings to show that SDF is a robust phenomenon and suggest boundary conditions for the effect to be observed.
2017
Episodic memory; Executive control; Inhibition; Motivated forgetting; Selective directed forgetting; Psychology (all)
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Exploring mechanisms of selective directed forgetting / Aguirre, C; Gómez-Ariza, Cj; Andrés, P; Mazzoni, G; Bajo, Mt. - In: FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 1664-1078. - 8:MAR(2017), pp. 1-15. [10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00316]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Aguirre_Exploring_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 787.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
787.03 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1187511
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact