The usefulness of providing career interventions in the transition from university to labour market is more and more advocated, in order to increase young people’s competencies about career management and entrepreneurial skills. The present paper aims at focusing on the effectiveness of career interventions for university or graduate students and on its relationship with some study design and intervention characteristics. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies published between 2000 and 2015 which complied with the following inclusion criteria: university or graduate students as target population, the evaluation of specific career-related interventions or programs, and an experimental or quasi-experimental design. The selection procedure resulted in 9 eligible studies - overall assessing 12 interventions - out of 823 examined articles. The results indicated, on average, a large effect (weighted ES=.80; 95% CI=.54, 1.06) better outcomes from socio-constructivist interventions compared to those based on social cognition theory and person-environment fit model, and higher impact on the reduction of career indecision than on the increase of decision-making self-efficacy. Some recommendations for researchers and policy makers are provided, as well as methodological issues and practical implications for career interventions are discussed.

What Do University or Graduate Students Need to Make the Cut? A Meta-analysis on Career Intervention Effectiveness / Langher, Viviana; Nannini, Valentina; Caputo, Andrea. - In: JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDIES. - ISSN 2037-7924. - 17:(2018), pp. 21-43. [10.7358/ecps-2018-017-lang]

What Do University or Graduate Students Need to Make the Cut? A Meta-analysis on Career Intervention Effectiveness.

Viviana Langher;Valentina Nannini;Andrea Caputo
2018

Abstract

The usefulness of providing career interventions in the transition from university to labour market is more and more advocated, in order to increase young people’s competencies about career management and entrepreneurial skills. The present paper aims at focusing on the effectiveness of career interventions for university or graduate students and on its relationship with some study design and intervention characteristics. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies published between 2000 and 2015 which complied with the following inclusion criteria: university or graduate students as target population, the evaluation of specific career-related interventions or programs, and an experimental or quasi-experimental design. The selection procedure resulted in 9 eligible studies - overall assessing 12 interventions - out of 823 examined articles. The results indicated, on average, a large effect (weighted ES=.80; 95% CI=.54, 1.06) better outcomes from socio-constructivist interventions compared to those based on social cognition theory and person-environment fit model, and higher impact on the reduction of career indecision than on the increase of decision-making self-efficacy. Some recommendations for researchers and policy makers are provided, as well as methodological issues and practical implications for career interventions are discussed.
2018
meta-analysis, career intervention, experimental or quasi-experimental design
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
What Do University or Graduate Students Need to Make the Cut? A Meta-analysis on Career Intervention Effectiveness / Langher, Viviana; Nannini, Valentina; Caputo, Andrea. - In: JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDIES. - ISSN 2037-7924. - 17:(2018), pp. 21-43. [10.7358/ecps-2018-017-lang]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1184881
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact