As Deborah Lupton argues in The Quantified Self, everyday practices and bodily functions have been monitored, measured and recorded since ancient times. These practices are now reconfigured trough self-tracking technologies, which are designed to be mobile, implantable and wearable, to collect and transform – automatically or not – the everyday elements of individual and urban life into graphics, statistics, and behavioral patterns. The sociological literature on self-tracking is recently beginning to emerge in a fragmented debate, given the complexity of this open-ended phenomenon. Indeed, several scholars have criticized self-tracking technologies for the further level of surveillance trough data (Kitchin and Dodge 2011). On the contrary, others underline the reflexive impact of data upon the users through a constant self-improvement and selfmanagement (Ruckenstein 2014), as well as the emergence of new ways of participatory democracy with the formation of citizen-science and citizensubjects (Gabrys 2014). The book outlines the discussions on selftracking practices from various sociocultural theoretical perspectives, using the concept of “self-tracking cultures” in order “to encapsulate the view […] that the practices, meanings, discourses and technologies associated with self-tracking are inherently and inevitably the product of broader social, cultural and political processes”.
Review Deborah Lupton. The Quantified Self. A sociology of Self-tracking. Cambridge, Polity, 2016, pp. 240 / Zampino, Letizia. - In: TECNOSCIENZA. - ISSN 2038-3460. - vol. 9:n. 1(2018).
Review Deborah Lupton. The Quantified Self. A sociology of Self-tracking. Cambridge, Polity, 2016, pp. 240
Letizia Zampino
2018
Abstract
As Deborah Lupton argues in The Quantified Self, everyday practices and bodily functions have been monitored, measured and recorded since ancient times. These practices are now reconfigured trough self-tracking technologies, which are designed to be mobile, implantable and wearable, to collect and transform – automatically or not – the everyday elements of individual and urban life into graphics, statistics, and behavioral patterns. The sociological literature on self-tracking is recently beginning to emerge in a fragmented debate, given the complexity of this open-ended phenomenon. Indeed, several scholars have criticized self-tracking technologies for the further level of surveillance trough data (Kitchin and Dodge 2011). On the contrary, others underline the reflexive impact of data upon the users through a constant self-improvement and selfmanagement (Ruckenstein 2014), as well as the emergence of new ways of participatory democracy with the formation of citizen-science and citizensubjects (Gabrys 2014). The book outlines the discussions on selftracking practices from various sociocultural theoretical perspectives, using the concept of “self-tracking cultures” in order “to encapsulate the view […] that the practices, meanings, discourses and technologies associated with self-tracking are inherently and inevitably the product of broader social, cultural and political processes”.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.