Background: Several empirical contributions brought contrasting results toward the role played by impulsivity and emotion regulation (ER) in Gambling Disorder (GD). Moreover, it is not clear how these two psychopathological aspects interact in relation to GD. Method: We administered to a sample of addicted gamblers (N=70) and a sample of community participants (N=100) the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS; Lesieur & Blume, 1987), the Impulsive Behavior Scale (Whiteside & Lynam, 2001) and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Gross & John, 2003). Results: As expected, addicted gamblers showed higher levels of impulsivity and suppression and lower levels of reappraisal compared to community participants. Moreover, GD severity was positively correlated to suppression and both negative and positive urgency but negatively correlated with reappraisal. Finally, a positive interaction between suppression and negative urgency emerged. Conclusions: Our results extended previous research, suggesting that emotional components of impulsivity and deficits in ER may be involved in GD. Noteworthy, our study shed light on the interaction between ER capacities and the proneness to act rashly under the influence of negative emotions. Future directions toward the role of positive emotions accounting for GD are discussed.

Positive and negative urgency among addicted gamblers: the role of emotional suppression / Rogier, G.; Moccia, L.; Di, Nicola; Velotti, P.. - In: JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS. - ISSN 2062-5871. - 7:(2018), pp. 135-136. (Intervento presentato al convegno International Conference on Behavioral Addictions tenutosi a Cologne, Germany).

Positive and negative urgency among addicted gamblers: the role of emotional suppression

Rogier G.;Velotti P.
2018

Abstract

Background: Several empirical contributions brought contrasting results toward the role played by impulsivity and emotion regulation (ER) in Gambling Disorder (GD). Moreover, it is not clear how these two psychopathological aspects interact in relation to GD. Method: We administered to a sample of addicted gamblers (N=70) and a sample of community participants (N=100) the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS; Lesieur & Blume, 1987), the Impulsive Behavior Scale (Whiteside & Lynam, 2001) and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Gross & John, 2003). Results: As expected, addicted gamblers showed higher levels of impulsivity and suppression and lower levels of reappraisal compared to community participants. Moreover, GD severity was positively correlated to suppression and both negative and positive urgency but negatively correlated with reappraisal. Finally, a positive interaction between suppression and negative urgency emerged. Conclusions: Our results extended previous research, suggesting that emotional components of impulsivity and deficits in ER may be involved in GD. Noteworthy, our study shed light on the interaction between ER capacities and the proneness to act rashly under the influence of negative emotions. Future directions toward the role of positive emotions accounting for GD are discussed.
2018
International Conference on Behavioral Addictions
gambling disorder; impulsivity; emotion regulation
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04c Atto di convegno in rivista
Positive and negative urgency among addicted gamblers: the role of emotional suppression / Rogier, G.; Moccia, L.; Di, Nicola; Velotti, P.. - In: JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS. - ISSN 2062-5871. - 7:(2018), pp. 135-136. (Intervento presentato al convegno International Conference on Behavioral Addictions tenutosi a Cologne, Germany).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1177109
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact