Intimate partner violence (IPV) is one of the most common forms of violence against women (WHO, 2012). Despite the increasingly well-documented literature on the association between IPV and depression, posttraumatic stress disorder and anxiety, there has been relatively less empirical focus on the interactions between IPV and personality disorders. Furthemore child’s exposure to violence in the family resulted as a major predictor of subsequent exposure to IPV victimization. Research on abused and traumatized samples has shown high frequencies of unresolved/disorganized attachment in adults. Attachment disorganization is associated with major problems of affect regulation and mentalizing deficits. This study has three aims: to investigate the associations between personality features and IPV; to analyze the relationship between childhood trauma and victimization in adulthood; to investigate attachment and mentalization ability in order to identify specific mentalizing and attachment profiles of women IPV victims. A sample of forty women, recruited through anti-violence centers, were administered the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI, George et al., 1984) and completed the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ, Fonagy et al., 2016). The hostile/helpless coding system (Lyons-Ruth & Melnick, 2004), the Complex Trauma Questionnaire (ComplexTQ, Vergano et al., 2015), and the Reflective Functioning Scale (RFS, Fonagy et al., 1998) were applied to AAI transcripts. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Coding was conducted by two trained coders, and certified as reliable in the use of the AAI. The protocols were double coded for RFQ, ComplexTQ and RFS. The clinicians completed Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure–200 (Shedler et al., 2014), Modes of Mentalization Scale (MMS; Gagliardini et al., 2017) and Polarities of Mentalization Scale (PMS; Gagliardini e Colli, 2017). Results will be discussed in terms of clinical and theoretical implications.
PERSONALITY, ATTACHMENT AND MENTALIZATION IN INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE / Condino, Valeria; Giovanardi, Guido; Pajardi, Daniela; Colli, Antonello. - In: MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 2282-1619. - ELETTRONICO. - 6:2(2018), pp. 138-138. (Intervento presentato al convegno XX NATIONAL CONGRESS ITALIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION CLINICAL AND DYNAMIC SECTION tenutosi a Urbino, Italia).
PERSONALITY, ATTACHMENT AND MENTALIZATION IN INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
Valeria CondinoPrimo
;Guido Giovanardi
;
2018
Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is one of the most common forms of violence against women (WHO, 2012). Despite the increasingly well-documented literature on the association between IPV and depression, posttraumatic stress disorder and anxiety, there has been relatively less empirical focus on the interactions between IPV and personality disorders. Furthemore child’s exposure to violence in the family resulted as a major predictor of subsequent exposure to IPV victimization. Research on abused and traumatized samples has shown high frequencies of unresolved/disorganized attachment in adults. Attachment disorganization is associated with major problems of affect regulation and mentalizing deficits. This study has three aims: to investigate the associations between personality features and IPV; to analyze the relationship between childhood trauma and victimization in adulthood; to investigate attachment and mentalization ability in order to identify specific mentalizing and attachment profiles of women IPV victims. A sample of forty women, recruited through anti-violence centers, were administered the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI, George et al., 1984) and completed the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ, Fonagy et al., 2016). The hostile/helpless coding system (Lyons-Ruth & Melnick, 2004), the Complex Trauma Questionnaire (ComplexTQ, Vergano et al., 2015), and the Reflective Functioning Scale (RFS, Fonagy et al., 1998) were applied to AAI transcripts. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Coding was conducted by two trained coders, and certified as reliable in the use of the AAI. The protocols were double coded for RFQ, ComplexTQ and RFS. The clinicians completed Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure–200 (Shedler et al., 2014), Modes of Mentalization Scale (MMS; Gagliardini et al., 2017) and Polarities of Mentalization Scale (PMS; Gagliardini e Colli, 2017). Results will be discussed in terms of clinical and theoretical implications.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.