Purpose: To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes and post-operative compliance of fascial surgical repair in the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Materials and Methods: The authors analyzed 147 patients before and after surgical treatment for POP analyzing pre- and post-operative symptoms. Patients were divided into two groups: group A patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy, associated with anterior, posterior, and/or both vaginal repair; group B that underwent only anterior and/or posterior surgical vaginal correction. Results: The average time of post-operative hospitalization was significantly longer in group A than in group B (p = 0.019). However group A showed a better outcome in terms of days after surgery regarding post voiding residual <100 cc (p = 0.039). During follow-up, urinary incontinence improved (p= 0.001), whereas pelvic pressure, regular bowel function, and improvement 'in sexual activity were not significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Currently we do not have a surgical procedure which can be considered the best for treating prolapse, so it seems that the best option is a personalized surgery tailored for each patient.
The relevance of fascial surgical repair in the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) / Nobili, F; Lukic, A; Puccica, I; Vitali, M; Schimberni, M; Manzara, F; Frega, A; Mossa, B; Moscarini, M; Caserta, D.. - In: CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY. - ISSN 0390-6663. - 44:5(2017), pp. 744-748. [10.12891/ceog4001.2017]
The relevance of fascial surgical repair in the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP)
Lukic A;Schimberni M;Frega A;Mossa B;Moscarini M;Caserta D.
2017
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes and post-operative compliance of fascial surgical repair in the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Materials and Methods: The authors analyzed 147 patients before and after surgical treatment for POP analyzing pre- and post-operative symptoms. Patients were divided into two groups: group A patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy, associated with anterior, posterior, and/or both vaginal repair; group B that underwent only anterior and/or posterior surgical vaginal correction. Results: The average time of post-operative hospitalization was significantly longer in group A than in group B (p = 0.019). However group A showed a better outcome in terms of days after surgery regarding post voiding residual <100 cc (p = 0.039). During follow-up, urinary incontinence improved (p= 0.001), whereas pelvic pressure, regular bowel function, and improvement 'in sexual activity were not significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Currently we do not have a surgical procedure which can be considered the best for treating prolapse, so it seems that the best option is a personalized surgery tailored for each patient.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Nobili_The-relevance_2017.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.54 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.54 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.