Background Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is as effective as two-stage endo-laparoscopic treatment, but with shorter hospital stay, lower cost and recurrent stone rate. Aim of this paper was to report the authors’ experience with LCBDE during LC. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LCBDE for ductal stones was performed. Recurrent stones were defined as CBD stones detected beyond 6 months from the procedure. Postoperative biliary stricture was defined as a symptomatic reduction of CBD diameter. Results Out of 3444 patients who underwent LC, 384 (11%) had CBD stones treated by trans-cystic duct exploration [214 (6%) patients, TCD-CBDE] or choledochotomy [170 (5%) patients, C-CBDE]. For TCD-CBDE and C-CBDE, mean operative time was 127 ± 69 and 191 ± 74 min, respectively. Major morbidity rate was 3% (n = 6) in TCD-CBDE and 6% (n = 11) in C-CBDE. The incidence of residual stones was 5% (n = 20) and complete ductal clearance rate was 95% (n = 364). After long-term follow-up (mean 189 ± 105 months) the recurrent stone rate was 2%. Discussion In expert centers, LCBDE during LC is safe and effective with low short and long term morbidity rates.

A 23 year experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration / Quaresima, Silvia; Balla, Andrea; Guerrieri, Mario; Campagnacci, Roberto; Lezoche, Emanuele; Paganini, Alessandro M.. - In: HPB. - ISSN 1365-182X. - STAMPA. - 19:1(2017), pp. 29-35. [10.1016/j.hpb.2016.10.011]

A 23 year experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

Quaresima, Silvia
Primo
;
Balla, Andrea
Secondo
;
Lezoche, Emanuele;Paganini, Alessandro M.
2017

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is as effective as two-stage endo-laparoscopic treatment, but with shorter hospital stay, lower cost and recurrent stone rate. Aim of this paper was to report the authors’ experience with LCBDE during LC. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LCBDE for ductal stones was performed. Recurrent stones were defined as CBD stones detected beyond 6 months from the procedure. Postoperative biliary stricture was defined as a symptomatic reduction of CBD diameter. Results Out of 3444 patients who underwent LC, 384 (11%) had CBD stones treated by trans-cystic duct exploration [214 (6%) patients, TCD-CBDE] or choledochotomy [170 (5%) patients, C-CBDE]. For TCD-CBDE and C-CBDE, mean operative time was 127 ± 69 and 191 ± 74 min, respectively. Major morbidity rate was 3% (n = 6) in TCD-CBDE and 6% (n = 11) in C-CBDE. The incidence of residual stones was 5% (n = 20) and complete ductal clearance rate was 95% (n = 364). After long-term follow-up (mean 189 ± 105 months) the recurrent stone rate was 2%. Discussion In expert centers, LCBDE during LC is safe and effective with low short and long term morbidity rates.
2017
Adolescent; adult; aged; aged 80 and over; biliary tract surgical procedures; child; choledocholithiasis; common bile duct; female; gallstones; humans; Italy; male; middle aged; operative time; recurrence; retrospective studies; risk factors; time factors; treatment outcome; young adult; cholecystectomy laparoscopic; laparoscopy; hepatology; gastroenterology
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
A 23 year experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration / Quaresima, Silvia; Balla, Andrea; Guerrieri, Mario; Campagnacci, Roberto; Lezoche, Emanuele; Paganini, Alessandro M.. - In: HPB. - ISSN 1365-182X. - STAMPA. - 19:1(2017), pp. 29-35. [10.1016/j.hpb.2016.10.011]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Quaresima_Bile-duct_2017.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 362.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
362.73 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1134306
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 48
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
social impact