Purpose: To evaluate by Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM) the corneal incision architecture after intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in pig eyes, using manual, automated injectors or preloaded delivery systems. Methods: Twenty-four pig eyes underwent IOL implantation in the anterior chamber using three different injectors: manual (Monarch III) (n = 8), automated (AutoSert) (n = 8), or a preloaded system (UltraSert) (n = 8). Acrysof IQ IOLs, 21 Dioptres (D) (n = 12) and 27D (n = 12), were implanted through 2.2 mm clear corneal incisions. Incision width was measured using corneal calipers. The endothelial side of the incision was analyzed with ESEM. Results: In each group, the final size of the corneal wound after IOL implantation, measured by calipers, was 2.3–2.4 mm. The incision architecture resulted more irregular in the Monarch group compared with the other injectors. In every group the 27D IOL-implanted specimens showed more alterations than in 21D IOL-implanted samples, and this was less evident in the UltraSert group. The Descemet tear length was higher in the Monarch group than AutoSert and UltraSert group. Conclusions: The automated and preloaded delivery systems provided a good corneal incision architecture; after high-power IOL implantation the incisions were more regular and less damaged with the preloaded system than with the other devices.

Corneal incision architecture after IOL implantation with three different injectors: an environmental scanning electron microscopy study / Mencucci, Rita; Favuzza, Eleonora; Salvatici, Maria Cristina; Spadea, Leopoldo; Allen, David. - In: INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY. - ISSN 0165-5701. - STAMPA. - (2019), pp. 1-7. [10.1007/s10792-018-0825-2]

Corneal incision architecture after IOL implantation with three different injectors: an environmental scanning electron microscopy study

Spadea, Leopoldo
Penultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
;
2019

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate by Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM) the corneal incision architecture after intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in pig eyes, using manual, automated injectors or preloaded delivery systems. Methods: Twenty-four pig eyes underwent IOL implantation in the anterior chamber using three different injectors: manual (Monarch III) (n = 8), automated (AutoSert) (n = 8), or a preloaded system (UltraSert) (n = 8). Acrysof IQ IOLs, 21 Dioptres (D) (n = 12) and 27D (n = 12), were implanted through 2.2 mm clear corneal incisions. Incision width was measured using corneal calipers. The endothelial side of the incision was analyzed with ESEM. Results: In each group, the final size of the corneal wound after IOL implantation, measured by calipers, was 2.3–2.4 mm. The incision architecture resulted more irregular in the Monarch group compared with the other injectors. In every group the 27D IOL-implanted specimens showed more alterations than in 21D IOL-implanted samples, and this was less evident in the UltraSert group. The Descemet tear length was higher in the Monarch group than AutoSert and UltraSert group. Conclusions: The automated and preloaded delivery systems provided a good corneal incision architecture; after high-power IOL implantation the incisions were more regular and less damaged with the preloaded system than with the other devices.
2019
Cataract; Corneal incision; Environmental scanning electron microscopy; Injector; Intraocular lens; Preloaded injector; Ophthalmology
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Corneal incision architecture after IOL implantation with three different injectors: an environmental scanning electron microscopy study / Mencucci, Rita; Favuzza, Eleonora; Salvatici, Maria Cristina; Spadea, Leopoldo; Allen, David. - In: INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY. - ISSN 0165-5701. - STAMPA. - (2019), pp. 1-7. [10.1007/s10792-018-0825-2]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Mencucci_Corneal_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 635.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
635.55 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1132745
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact