In this paper I would like to situate Michel Henry’s position within the context of the phenomenological debate on inter-subjectivity. By distinguishing an apriori and an a posteriori approach to inter-subjectivity, I will try to demonstrate that Henry adopts the first solution. From this vantage point, Henry’s pathos-avec appears to be much more closer to the notion of ‘Mit-sein ’, than his harsh criticism against Heidegger would suggests – which exposes Henry’s position to all the difficulties of the a priori model in general and of that of Heidegger in particular.
Modelli fenomenologici di intersoggettività: la posizione di Michel Henry / Bancalari, Stefano. - In: AZIMUTH. - ISSN 2282-4863. - STAMPA. - (2018), pp. 45-60.
Modelli fenomenologici di intersoggettività: la posizione di Michel Henry
Stefano Bancalari
2018
Abstract
In this paper I would like to situate Michel Henry’s position within the context of the phenomenological debate on inter-subjectivity. By distinguishing an apriori and an a posteriori approach to inter-subjectivity, I will try to demonstrate that Henry adopts the first solution. From this vantage point, Henry’s pathos-avec appears to be much more closer to the notion of ‘Mit-sein ’, than his harsh criticism against Heidegger would suggests – which exposes Henry’s position to all the difficulties of the a priori model in general and of that of Heidegger in particular.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Bancalari_Modelli_2018.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
159.74 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
159.74 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.