The aim of the work is to investigate the performance of two localization techniques based on WiFi signals: the WiFi-based passive radar and a device-based technique that exploits the measurement of angle of arrival (AoA) and time difference of arrival. This paper focuses specifically on the accuracy of the AoA measurements. As expected, the results show that for both techniques the AoA accuracy depends on the signal-to-noise ratio also in terms of the number of exploited received signal samples. For the passive radar, very accurate estimates are obtained; however, loss of detections can appear only when the rate of the Access Point packets is strongly reduced. In contrast, device-based estimates accuracy is lower, since it suffers of the limited number of emitted packets when the device is not uploading data. However, it allows localization also of stationary targets, which is impossible for the passive radar. This suggests that the two techniques are complementary and their fusion could provide a sensibly increase performance with respect to the individual techniques.
2D localization with WiFi passive radar and device-based techniques: an analysis of target measurements accuracy / Milani, Ileana; Colone, Fabiola; Lombardo, Pierfrancesco. - 2018:(2018), pp. 1-10. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2018 19th International Radar Symposium (IRS 2018) tenutosi a Bonn; Germany) [10.23919/IRS.2018.8447957].
2D localization with WiFi passive radar and device-based techniques: an analysis of target measurements accuracy
Ileana Milani;Fabiola Colone;Pierfrancesco Lombardo
2018
Abstract
The aim of the work is to investigate the performance of two localization techniques based on WiFi signals: the WiFi-based passive radar and a device-based technique that exploits the measurement of angle of arrival (AoA) and time difference of arrival. This paper focuses specifically on the accuracy of the AoA measurements. As expected, the results show that for both techniques the AoA accuracy depends on the signal-to-noise ratio also in terms of the number of exploited received signal samples. For the passive radar, very accurate estimates are obtained; however, loss of detections can appear only when the rate of the Access Point packets is strongly reduced. In contrast, device-based estimates accuracy is lower, since it suffers of the limited number of emitted packets when the device is not uploading data. However, it allows localization also of stationary targets, which is impossible for the passive radar. This suggests that the two techniques are complementary and their fusion could provide a sensibly increase performance with respect to the individual techniques.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Milani_2D-localization_2018.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.04 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.04 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
Milani_2D-localization_post-print_2018.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
854.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
854.69 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.