Background: Motor training usually increases the excitability of corticospinal outputs to the trained muscles. However, it is uncertain to what extent the change in excitability is a critical component of behavioral learning or whether it is a non-specific side effect. Objective/Hypothesis: We used a depotentiation protocol to abolish the training-induced increase of corticospinal excitability and tested whether this had any immediate effect on the improved motor performance. Methods: We used an index finger abduction task in which behavioral improvement is known to be associated with M1 excitability changes as monitored by the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials produced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). These effects could be reversed by a depotentiation protocol using a short form of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS150). Participants underwent three experimental interventions: 'motor training', 'motor training plus cTBS150' and 'cTBS150'. M1 excitability and TMS-evoked finger movements were assessed before the experimental interventions and 5 min, 15 min, and 30 min thereafter. Motor retention was tested 45 min after the experimental interventions. Results: During training, acceleration of the practiced movement improved. At the end of training, M1 excitability and the acceleration of TMS-evoked index finger movements in the direction of training had increased and the enhanced performance was retained when tested 45 min later. The depotentiation protocol, delivered immediately after the end of training, reversed the excitability changes in M1 but did not affect the acceleration of the TMS-evoked finger movement nor the retention of performance. The depotentiation protocol alone did not modify M1 excitability. Conclusions: The present study indicates that in the short term, increases in corticospinal excitability are not related to immediate changes in behavioral motor outcome.

Reversal of practice-related effects on corticospinal excitability has no immediate effect on behavioral outcome / Bologna, Matteo; Rocchi, Lorenzo; Paparella, Giulia; Nardella, Andrea; Voti, Pietro Li; Conte, Antonella; Kojovic, Maja; Rothwell, John C.; Berardelli, Alfredo. - In: BRAIN STIMULATION. - ISSN 1935-861X. - 8:3(2015), pp. 603-612. [10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.405]

Reversal of practice-related effects on corticospinal excitability has no immediate effect on behavioral outcome

Bologna, Matteo;Paparella, Giulia;Nardella, Andrea;Voti, Pietro Li;Conte, Antonella;Berardelli, Alfredo
2015

Abstract

Background: Motor training usually increases the excitability of corticospinal outputs to the trained muscles. However, it is uncertain to what extent the change in excitability is a critical component of behavioral learning or whether it is a non-specific side effect. Objective/Hypothesis: We used a depotentiation protocol to abolish the training-induced increase of corticospinal excitability and tested whether this had any immediate effect on the improved motor performance. Methods: We used an index finger abduction task in which behavioral improvement is known to be associated with M1 excitability changes as monitored by the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials produced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). These effects could be reversed by a depotentiation protocol using a short form of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS150). Participants underwent three experimental interventions: 'motor training', 'motor training plus cTBS150' and 'cTBS150'. M1 excitability and TMS-evoked finger movements were assessed before the experimental interventions and 5 min, 15 min, and 30 min thereafter. Motor retention was tested 45 min after the experimental interventions. Results: During training, acceleration of the practiced movement improved. At the end of training, M1 excitability and the acceleration of TMS-evoked index finger movements in the direction of training had increased and the enhanced performance was retained when tested 45 min later. The depotentiation protocol, delivered immediately after the end of training, reversed the excitability changes in M1 but did not affect the acceleration of the TMS-evoked finger movement nor the retention of performance. The depotentiation protocol alone did not modify M1 excitability. Conclusions: The present study indicates that in the short term, increases in corticospinal excitability are not related to immediate changes in behavioral motor outcome.
2015
Depotentiation; Primary motor cortex; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Adult; Electromyography; Evoked Potentials, Motor; Female; Fingers; Humans; Learning; Long-Term Synaptic Depression; Male; Motor Cortex; Motor Skills; Movement; Muscle, Skeletal; Pyramidal Tracts; Theta Rhythm; Time Factors; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Young Adult; Neuroscience (all); Biophysics; Neurology (clinical)
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Reversal of practice-related effects on corticospinal excitability has no immediate effect on behavioral outcome / Bologna, Matteo; Rocchi, Lorenzo; Paparella, Giulia; Nardella, Andrea; Voti, Pietro Li; Conte, Antonella; Kojovic, Maja; Rothwell, John C.; Berardelli, Alfredo. - In: BRAIN STIMULATION. - ISSN 1935-861X. - 8:3(2015), pp. 603-612. [10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.405]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S1935861X15008682-main (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Bologna_Reversal of Practice-related Effects_2015
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.55 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.55 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1117737
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact