Assessing whether the patterns of brain activity systematically differ when the subject is presented with different sets of stimuli is called 'brain decoding'. The most common solution to this problem is based on testing whether a classifier can accurately predict the type of stimulus from brain data. In this work we present a novel approach to the brain decoding problem which does not require any classifier. The proposed method is based on a high-dimensional two-sample test recently proposed in the machine learning literature. The test tries to determine whether the set of brain recordings related to one kind of stimulus, i.e. the first sample, and the ones related to the other kind of stimulus, i.e. the second sample, are drawn from the same probability distribution or not. In this work we illustrate the advantages of this novel approach together with experimental evidence of its efficacy on magneto encephalographic (MEG) data from a Face, House and Body discrimination task. © 2013 IEEE.

The kernel two-sample test vs. brain decoding / Olivetti, Emanuele; Benozzo, Danilo; Kia, Seyed Mostafa; Ellero, Marta; Hartmann, Thomas. - In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE. - ISSN 0018-9219. - (2013), pp. 128-131. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2013 3rd International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2013 tenutosi a Philadelphia, PA, usa) [10.1109/PRNI.2013.41].

The kernel two-sample test vs. brain decoding

Benozzo, Danilo;
2013

Abstract

Assessing whether the patterns of brain activity systematically differ when the subject is presented with different sets of stimuli is called 'brain decoding'. The most common solution to this problem is based on testing whether a classifier can accurately predict the type of stimulus from brain data. In this work we present a novel approach to the brain decoding problem which does not require any classifier. The proposed method is based on a high-dimensional two-sample test recently proposed in the machine learning literature. The test tries to determine whether the set of brain recordings related to one kind of stimulus, i.e. the first sample, and the ones related to the other kind of stimulus, i.e. the second sample, are drawn from the same probability distribution or not. In this work we illustrate the advantages of this novel approach together with experimental evidence of its efficacy on magneto encephalographic (MEG) data from a Face, House and Body discrimination task. © 2013 IEEE.
2013
2013 3rd International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2013
brain decoding; hypothesis testing; kernel methods; two-sample test; 1707; Biomedical Engineering
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04c Atto di convegno in rivista
The kernel two-sample test vs. brain decoding / Olivetti, Emanuele; Benozzo, Danilo; Kia, Seyed Mostafa; Ellero, Marta; Hartmann, Thomas. - In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE. - ISSN 0018-9219. - (2013), pp. 128-131. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2013 3rd International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2013 tenutosi a Philadelphia, PA, usa) [10.1109/PRNI.2013.41].
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1116778
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact