Purpose The FOLL05 trial compared R-CVP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone) with R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and R-FM (rituximab plus fludarabine and mitoxantrone) regimens without rituximab maintenance as initial therapy for patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL). A previous analysis with a median follow-up of 34 months showed a superior 3-year time to treatment failure, the primary study end point, with R-CHOP and R-FM versus R-CVP and showed R-CHOP to have a better risk-benefit ratio in terms of toxicity than R-FM. We report a post hoc analysis of this trial after a median follow-up of 7 years. Patients and Methods Of the 534 enrolled patients, 504 were evaluable. At the time of analysis, the median follow-up was 84 months (range, 1 to 119 months). Results The 8-year time to treatment failure and progression-free survival rates were 44% (95% CI, 39% to 49%) and 48% (95% CI, 43% to 53%), respectively. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival adjusted by FL International Prognostic Index 2 versus R-CVP was 0.73 for R-CHOP (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.98; P = .037) and 0.67 for R-FM (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.91; P = .009). The 8-year overall survival (OS) rate was 83% (95% CI, 79% to 87%), with no significant differences among study arms. Overall, we observed a higher risk of dying as a result of causes unrelated to lymphoma progression with R-FM versus R-CVP. Conclusion With an 83% 8-year OS rate, long-Term follow-up of the FOLL05 trial confirms the favorable outcome of patients with advanced-stage FL treated with immunochemotherapy. The three study arms had similar OS but different activity and toxicity profiles. Patients initially treated with R-CVP had a higher risk of lymphoma progression compared with those receiving R-CHOP, as well as a higher risk of requiring additional therapy.

Long-term results of the FOLL05 trial comparing R-CVP versus R-CHOP versus R-FM for the initial treatment of patients with advanced-stage symptomatic follicular lymphoma / Luminari, Stefano; Ferrari, Angela; Manni, Martina; Dondi, Alessandra; Chiarenza, Annalisa; Merli, Francesco; Rusconi, Chiara; Tarantino, Vittoria; Tucci, Alessandra; Vitolo, Umberto; Kovalchuk, Sofia; Angelucci, Emanuele; Pulsoni, Alessandro; Arcaini, Luca; Angrilli, Francesco; Gaidano, Gianluca; Stelitano, Caterina; Bertoldero, Giovanni; Cascavilla, Nicola; Salvi, Flavia; Ferreri, Andŕes J. M.; Vallisa, Daniele; Marcheselli, Luigi; Federico, Massimo. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0732-183X. - 36:7(2018), pp. 689-696. [10.1200/JCO.2017.74.1652]

Long-term results of the FOLL05 trial comparing R-CVP versus R-CHOP versus R-FM for the initial treatment of patients with advanced-stage symptomatic follicular lymphoma

FERRARI, ANGELA;Pulsoni, Alessandro;
2018

Abstract

Purpose The FOLL05 trial compared R-CVP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone) with R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and R-FM (rituximab plus fludarabine and mitoxantrone) regimens without rituximab maintenance as initial therapy for patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL). A previous analysis with a median follow-up of 34 months showed a superior 3-year time to treatment failure, the primary study end point, with R-CHOP and R-FM versus R-CVP and showed R-CHOP to have a better risk-benefit ratio in terms of toxicity than R-FM. We report a post hoc analysis of this trial after a median follow-up of 7 years. Patients and Methods Of the 534 enrolled patients, 504 were evaluable. At the time of analysis, the median follow-up was 84 months (range, 1 to 119 months). Results The 8-year time to treatment failure and progression-free survival rates were 44% (95% CI, 39% to 49%) and 48% (95% CI, 43% to 53%), respectively. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival adjusted by FL International Prognostic Index 2 versus R-CVP was 0.73 for R-CHOP (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.98; P = .037) and 0.67 for R-FM (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.91; P = .009). The 8-year overall survival (OS) rate was 83% (95% CI, 79% to 87%), with no significant differences among study arms. Overall, we observed a higher risk of dying as a result of causes unrelated to lymphoma progression with R-FM versus R-CVP. Conclusion With an 83% 8-year OS rate, long-Term follow-up of the FOLL05 trial confirms the favorable outcome of patients with advanced-stage FL treated with immunochemotherapy. The three study arms had similar OS but different activity and toxicity profiles. Patients initially treated with R-CVP had a higher risk of lymphoma progression compared with those receiving R-CHOP, as well as a higher risk of requiring additional therapy.
2018
Oncology; Cancer Research
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Long-term results of the FOLL05 trial comparing R-CVP versus R-CHOP versus R-FM for the initial treatment of patients with advanced-stage symptomatic follicular lymphoma / Luminari, Stefano; Ferrari, Angela; Manni, Martina; Dondi, Alessandra; Chiarenza, Annalisa; Merli, Francesco; Rusconi, Chiara; Tarantino, Vittoria; Tucci, Alessandra; Vitolo, Umberto; Kovalchuk, Sofia; Angelucci, Emanuele; Pulsoni, Alessandro; Arcaini, Luca; Angrilli, Francesco; Gaidano, Gianluca; Stelitano, Caterina; Bertoldero, Giovanni; Cascavilla, Nicola; Salvi, Flavia; Ferreri, Andŕes J. M.; Vallisa, Daniele; Marcheselli, Luigi; Federico, Massimo. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0732-183X. - 36:7(2018), pp. 689-696. [10.1200/JCO.2017.74.1652]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Luminari_Long-term_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 835.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
835.05 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1114246
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 28
  • Scopus 96
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 92
social impact